[antoinetoussaint-byte]

Do not merge — opened for review; the owner releases.

Why

Release archives of this agent are compiled by ghcr.io/goreleaser/goreleaser-cross:v1.27.1-1, i.e. go1.27.1, which carries GO-2026-6809 (crypto/x509), fixed in go1.27.3.

Go literals found (verified from source at 2eb7c4a)

Literal	Where	Class
go 1.27.0	go.mod:3	floor
goreleaser-cross:v1.27.1-1	.github/workflows/releaser.yml	selector (the compiler that ships)
go-version-file: go.mod	.github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/releaser.yml (test job)	hygiene — already follows the floor, untouched

No golang: image, no GOTOOLCHAIN, no toolchain line, no go-version: literal anywhere. The templates/ Dockerfiles (where present) build generated services, not Go.

Mechanism

A go directive is a floor. goreleaser-cross sets no GOTOOLCHAIN, so its go1.27.1 auto-switches up to the directive when the directive is higher: the shipped compiler is max(directive, image go). Raising the directive to 1.27.3 is therefore the fix that ships on its own. The goreleaser-cross v1.27.3 tag exists (checked via the GitHub tags API today), so the image pin moves too as the belt to that brace — with both in place the image already runs the floor and no download happens at release time.

What changed

• go.mod: go 1.27.0 → go 1.27.3 (go mod tidy: no other change, go.sum untouched)
• .github/workflows/releaser.yml: goreleaser-cross:v1.27.1-1 → goreleaser-cross:v1.27.3

Local verification (host go1.27.3 darwin/arm64)

• go build ./... exit 0, go vet ./... exit 0, go test ./... exit 0 (all packages ok)
• go build -o agent . && go version -m agent first line: agent: go1.27.3

Classification

A fix at the place that owns the behaviour (the module floor and the release toolchain pin). Not a hack.

Deliberately not done

• No toolchain line in go.mod (it would pin instead of floor).
• No GOTOOLCHAIN=go1.27.3 in the workflow (a backwards selector that would have to be chased on every patch).
• No change to go-version-file: go.mod steps — they already follow the floor.

Not verified

• The released archive itself: it does not exist until the owner cuts a tag. The CI on this PR runs ci.yml only; the release job is tag-triggered.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[antoinetoussaint-byte]

A lazybox agent is working on this. codex (o159 build into own privatehome if needed, but no new runtime functionality. Await actual selected-source mapping before final necessity decision; keep existing95 release/compiler fix intact.

• I’ll keep PR #95 unchanged and wait for Wiki10889’s exact artifact and declaration mapping. I won’t add a persistent runtime or treat Test execution as service lifecycle proof.

• Edited .lazybox/artifacts/python95-source-audit.md (+3 -1)
37 -The initial source/overlap plan and the lifecycle mismatch were sent directly to terminal10879. Root must identi fy Wiki's actual selected generic Python launch declaration/artifact, or explicitly choose a generic service lif ecycle addition. Without that input, the requested ordinary workload Start/Stop proof would be fabricated or wou + Show details
• Ran git status --short --branch; git rev-parse HEAD
└ ## fix/go-1.27.3-go-2026-6809...origin/fix/go-1.27.3-go-2026-6809
537b654

• Holding PR #95 clean at 537b654, with compiler/releaser fix and release hold intact. Audit updated: no new runtime functionality.

Awaiting Wiki10889’s selected artifact, declaration, and actual use before deciding whether native-writer adoption is necessary.

Worked for 25s • 1:28 AM ⚠ weekly limit: 25% left · /status
› Ask Codex to do anything

GPT-6-Astra · high) started at 2026-10-28 05:17 UTC, last renewed the claim at 2026-10-28 17:14 UTC, and the claim lapses at 2026-10-28 17:59 UTC unless it is renewed again. A claim is an assertion with an expiry, not proof that a process is alive.

claim detail

Lazybox-Claim-Device: effacd542b611010656e
Lazybox-Claim-Session: b5f2d8b1a9
Lazybox-Claim-Workspace: github-codefly-dev-service-python-95
Lazybox-Claim-Agent: codex
Lazybox-Claim-Model: o159 build into own privatehome if needed, but no new runtime           functionality. Await actual selected-source mapping before final necessity decision; keep existing95 release/compiler   fix intact.


• I’ll keep PR #95 unchanged and wait for Wiki10889’s exact artifact and declaration mapping. I won’t add a persistent    runtime or treat Test execution as service lifecycle proof.

• Edited .lazybox/artifacts/python95-source-audit.md (+3 -1)
    37 -The initial source/overlap plan and the lifecycle mismatch were sent directly to terminal10879. Root must identi        fy Wiki's actual selected generic Python launch declaration/artifact, or explicitly choose a generic service lif        ecycle addition. Without that input, the requested ordinary workload Start/Stop proof would be fabricated or wou    + Show details                                                                                                      
• Ran git status --short --branch; git rev-parse HEAD
  └ ## fix/go-1.27.3-go-2026-6809...origin/fix/go-1.27.3-go-2026-6809
    537b654535b7614f47a1c6e42e9fd83316663f16

• Holding PR #95 clean at 537b654, with compiler/releaser fix and release hold intact. Audit updated: no new runtime      functionality.

  Awaiting Wiki10889’s selected artifact, declaration, and actual use before deciding whether native-writer adoption is   necessary.

  Worked for 25s • 1:28 AM                                                                                              ⚠ weekly limit: 25% left · /status 
› Ask Codex to do anything

  GPT-6-Astra · high
Lazybox-Claim-Started: 2026-10-28T05:17:27Z
Lazybox-Claim-Heartbeat: 2026-10-28T17:14:00Z
Lazybox-Claim-Expires: 2026-10-28T17:59:00Z