⚡️ Speed up function normalize_temp_matrix by 41%#25
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Open
⚡️ Speed up function normalize_temp_matrix by 41%#25codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
normalize_temp_matrix by 41%#25codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **41% speedup** by eliminating redundant computations of `np.amin()`. **Key optimization:** - **Cached min/max values**: The original code calls `np.amin(thermal_np)` twice - once for the numerator and once for the denominator. The optimized version computes `min_val` and `max_val` once and reuses them, reducing expensive array traversals from 3 to 2. **Why this matters:** `np.amin()` and `np.amax()` are O(n) operations that scan the entire array. For large matrices, this redundant computation becomes significant overhead. The line profiler shows the original's first line (with duplicate `np.amin`) took 45.6% of total time, while the optimized version distributes this more efficiently across separate min/max calculations. **Performance characteristics:** - **Small arrays (< 100 elements)**: Modest 3-10% improvements due to reduced function call overhead - **Large arrays (1000x1000)**: Substantial 40-65% speedups where the redundant array traversal becomes the dominant cost - **Edge cases**: Consistent improvements across all test scenarios including NaN/inf inputs and uniform value arrays The optimization is particularly effective for thermal imaging workflows that typically process large temperature matrices where every array traversal counts.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 41% (0.41x) speedup for
normalize_temp_matrixinopendm/thermal_tools/thermal_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
8.76 milliseconds→6.20 milliseconds(best of274runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 41% speedup by eliminating redundant computations of
np.amin().Key optimization:
np.amin(thermal_np)twice - once for the numerator and once for the denominator. The optimized version computesmin_valandmax_valonce and reuses them, reducing expensive array traversals from 3 to 2.Why this matters:
np.amin()andnp.amax()are O(n) operations that scan the entire array. For large matrices, this redundant computation becomes significant overhead. The line profiler shows the original's first line (with duplicatenp.amin) took 45.6% of total time, while the optimized version distributes this more efficiently across separate min/max calculations.Performance characteristics:
The optimization is particularly effective for thermal imaging workflows that typically process large temperature matrices where every array traversal counts.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-normalize_temp_matrix-mh5gru5aand push.