Skip to content

EXP-1609: Fix broken images — fetch Git LFS content in checkout - #1864

Merged
pmckinney-codat merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
exp-1609/checkout-lfs
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

EXP-1609: Fix broken images — fetch Git LFS content in checkout#1864
pmckinney-codat merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
exp-1609/checkout-lfs

Conversation

@pmckinney-codat

@pmckinney-codat pmckinney-codat commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

All site images are currently serving as Git LFS pointer files on docs.codat.io (e.g. /logos/codat-docs-dark.png is 130 bytes of pointer text) because actions/checkout doesn't fetch LFS content by default. Vercel handled this via git_lfs = true in its project config; the equivalent here is lfs: true on checkout in both workflows.

Also explains the unsupported file type warnings in earlier CI builds — image-size reading pointer files.

Merging triggers a redeploy that restores all images. Part of EXP-1609.

⚠️ Watch item: Actions LFS pulls count against the repo's LFS bandwidth quota (Vercel's didn't). If builds are frequent enough to matter, a follow-up can cache LFS objects between runs.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

All jpg/jpeg/png are LFS-tracked, and actions/checkout defaults to
lfs: false, so the first Pages deploy shipped 130-byte pointer files
instead of images (Vercel handled LFS via git_lfs = true in its
project config).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
codat-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 27, 2026 1:17pm

Request Review

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Link check results for preview deployment (https://codat-docs-git-exp-1609-checkout-lfs-codat.vercel.app):

[]

@pmckinney-codat
pmckinney-codat merged commit e356b05 into main Jul 27, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@pmckinney-codat
pmckinney-codat deleted the exp-1609/checkout-lfs branch July 27, 2026 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants