Fix unintended side effects of delete_all and update_all with multi-tenancy for non-multi-tenant models

[B6 (a5-stable)]

Motivation / Background

The Arel::ActiveRecordRelationExtension module is currently prepended directly to ActiveRecord::Relation, which can lead to unintended side effects for models that do not support multi-tenancy.

e.g.

class PageView < ActiveRecord::Base
  multi_tenant :customer
  ...
end

class AnotherPageView < ActiveRecord::Base
  ...
end

# OK - works as expected
MultiTenant.with(customer) do
   PageView.all.delete_all
end
#=> DELETE FROM "page_views" WHERE "page_views"."id" IN (SELECT "page_views"."id" FROM "page_views" WHERE "page_views"."customer_id" = '1') AND "page_views"."customer_id" = '1'

But when running the same block for another model that doesn't support multi-tenancy:

MultiTenant.with(customer) do
  AnotherPageView.all.delete_all
end

# Current Query
#=> DELETE FROM "another_page_views" WHERE "another_page_views"."id" IN (SELECT "another_page_views"."id" FROM "another_page_views" WHERE "another_page_views"."customer_id" = '1') AND "another_page_views"."customer_id" = '1'

# Ideal Query; The query should not add an additional customer_id condition since AnotherPageView does not support multi-tenancy.
#=> DELETE FROM "another_page_views" WHERE "another_page_views"."id"

This happens because the module is being prepended to all relations, even those that shouldn't be influenced by multi-tenancy.

Solution

To fix this, we modified the code to call the original delete_all method when the model does not support multi-tenancy.

[B6 (a5-stable)]

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree