Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency next to v16.2.11 [security] - #2213

Merged
cert-manager-prow[bot] merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-next-vulnerability
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update dependency next to v16.2.11 [security]#2213
cert-manager-prow[bot] merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-next-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jul 23, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
next (source) 16.2.10 → 16.2.11 age adoption passing confidence

Next.js: Denial of Service in App Router using Server Actions

CVE-2026-64641 / GHSA-m99w-x7hq-7vfj

More information

Details

Impact

Crafted requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router with at least one Server Action can lead to excessive CPU usage blocking processing of further requests in the same process.

Workarounds

No workaround exists besides upgrading. Applications using Pages Router or not using Server Actions are not vulnerable.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.2 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Middleware / Proxy bypass in App Router applications using Turbopack and single locale

CVE-2026-64642 / GHSA-6gpp-xcg3-4w24

More information

Details

Impact

Crafted requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router built with Turbopack and a single entry in config.i18n.locales can bypass middleware/proxy based authentication.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, enforce authorization in the page's server-side data path instead of relying solely on middleware.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.3 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Unauthenticated disclosure of internal Server Function endpoints

CVE-2026-64643 / GHSA-955p-x3mx-jcvp

More information

Details

Impact

In Next.js applications using App Router, Server Actions (use server) or use cache endpoints can be disclosed bypassing any authentication on the pages where these endpoints are usually used.

Server Action IDs can be disclosed to unauthenticated users via publicly served client artifacts (for example, static chunks containing action references).

Affected users are applications using App Router + Server Actions.

By itself, this disclosure is typically a recon/enumeration primitive; however, it can increase risk when combined with other weaknesses.

Workarounds

Never assume any authentication claims at the use cache or use server boundary. Always authenticate within the boundary.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Denial of Service in the Image Optimization API using SVGs

CVE-2026-64644 / GHSA-q8wf-6r8g-63ch

More information

Details

Impact

When self-hosting Next.js with the default image loader, the Image Optimization API can optimize remotely hosted images if configured (not enabled by default). If those images contain malicious content, they can cause CPU exhaustion in /_next/image endpoints.

  • If you are using config.images.remotePatterns, only the patterns in that array are impacted.
  • If you are using config.images.unoptimized: true, you are NOT impacted.
  • If you are using config.images.loader: 'custom', you are NOT impacted.
  • If you are using Vercel, you are NOT impacted.
Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, you can avoid the expensive work by setting config.experimental.imgOptSkipMetadata : true.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in rewrites via attacker-controlled destination hostname

CVE-2026-64645 / GHSA-p9j2-gv94-2wf4

More information

Details

Impact

A rewrites() or redirects() rule that builds its external destination hostname from request-controlled input can be pointed at an arbitrary hostname, regardless of the rule's hostname suffix. For a rewrite, Next.js proxies the request to that arbitrary host and serves the response from the application's origin, leading to Server-Side Request forgery. A redirects() rule configured this way is vulnerable to an Open Redirect.

This affects any destination that puts a dynamic segment in the hostname, whether from the path:

// next.config.js
module.exports = {
  async rewrites() {
    return [
      {
        source: '/:tenant',
        destination: 'https://:tenant.api.example.com',
      },
    ]
  },
}

or from a has capture:

// next.config.js
module.exports = {
  async rewrites() {
    return [
      {
        source: '/',
        has: [{ type: 'query', key: 'region', value: '(?<region>.+)' }],
        destination: 'https://:region.api.example.com',
      },
    ]
  },
}
Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, do not build the hostname of an external rewrites() or redirects() destination from user-controlled input. If a dynamic subdomain is required, constrain the value to hostname-safe characters: value: '(?<region>[a-z0-9-]+)'.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.3 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Unbounded Server Action payload in Edge runtime

CVE-2026-64646 / GHSA-4c39-4ccg-62r3

More information

Details

Impact

Requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router with at least one Server Action can lead to excessive memory consumption if that Server Actions uses the Edge runtime

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade, ensure your hosting provider limits the request's body size. 5 MiB should be allowed at max by your hosting provider.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Cache confusion of response bodies for requests with bodies containing invalid UTF-8 byte sequences

CVE-2026-64647 / GHSA-4633-3j49-mh5q

More information

Details

Impact

A server-side fetch with a request body may return a cached response body from a different request to the same URL but different body. Confidential data in the POST's response body would then leak to unauthorized requests. Though the request itself will not be deduped.

This is only an issue when receiving request bodies with a content type charset other than UTF-8. For example, the UTF-16 byte sequences for 삃삃 and 섄섄 in the request body would share the same cache.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade, consider only making fetch requests with UTF-8 bodies (default in Next.js). Applications using Pages Router are not vulnerable.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Cache confusion of response bodies for requests with bodies

CVE-2026-64648 / GHSA-68g3-v927-f742

More information

Details

Impact

A server-side fetch with a request body may return a cached response body from a different request to the same URL but different body. Confidential data in the POST's response body would then leak to unauthorized requests. Though the request itself will not be deduped.

This only applies to fetch calls with a request that has a different init than the one passed to fetch.
Safe: fetch(new Request(init), init)
Unsafe: fetch(new Request(init), aDifferentInit)

Workarounds

No workaround exists besides upgrading. Applications using Pages Router are not vulnerable.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.0 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in Server Actions on custom servers

CVE-2026-64649 / GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x

More information

Details

Impact

When a Server Action forwards or redirects a request, an attacker can cause the server to send that outbound request to a malicious host (Server-Side Request Forgery). This requires the attacker's request to control Host-associated headers. In some configurations, it's also possible to obtain internal values that weaken middleware/proxy authorization.

Applications that use Server Actions are affected when the incoming host header is not fixed to a trusted value. This typically occurs on custom servers, or on deployments not behind a proxy that pins the host. Managed hosting pins the host upstream and is not affected; next start and standalone output do the same from version 14.2 onward.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade, ensure clients do not control the host header your application receives. Pin or validate Host and X-Forwarded-Host at your edge or proxy. On version 14.2.0 and later, you can additionally set the __NEXT_PRIVATE_ORIGIN environment variable to your deployment's real origin:

__NEXT_PRIVATE_ORIGIN=https://www.example.com node server.js

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 8.3 / 10 (High)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/b51206321854193208c0805ba42acc49287f942b](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/b51206321854193208c0805ba42acc49287f942b)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/e3e5666ccead3a15162793d697af5e48b7cc0498](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/e3e5666ccead3a15162793d697af5e48b7cc0498)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)
- [https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x)

This data is provided by the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Cache confusion of response bodies for requests with bodies containing invalid UTF-8 byte sequences
[CVE-2026-64647](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64647) / [GHSA-4633-3j49-mh5q](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-4633-3j49-mh5q)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A server-side `fetch` with a request body may return a cached **response** body from a different request to the same URL but different body. Confidential data in the `POST`'s **response** body would then leak to unauthorized requests. Though the request itself will not be deduped.

This is only an issue when receiving request bodies with a content type charset other than UTF-8. For example, the UTF-16 byte sequences for `삃삃` and `섄섄` in the request body would share the same cache.

##### Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade, consider only making fetch requests with UTF-8 bodies (default in Next.js). Applications using Pages Router are not vulnerable.

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-4633-3j49-mh5q](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-4633-3j49-mh5q)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/96008](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/96008)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/025bf4a5f7b47fb7758c4ebf1c931a61c451c082](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/025bf4a5f7b47fb7758c4ebf1c931a61c451c082)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)

This data is provided by [OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-4633-3j49-mh5q) and the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Unbounded Server Action payload in Edge runtime
[CVE-2026-64646](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64646) / [GHSA-4c39-4ccg-62r3](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-4c39-4ccg-62r3)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

Requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router with at least one Server Action can lead to excessive memory consumption if that Server Actions uses the Edge runtime

##### Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade, ensure your hosting provider limits the request's body size. 5 MiB should be allowed at max by your hosting provider.

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-4c39-4ccg-62r3](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-4c39-4ccg-62r3)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/57c31f724d746e86a9e8b92aa8be538a922446a4](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/57c31f724d746e86a9e8b92aa8be538a922446a4)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/9a4651e754f70b12e397694ffc41f44c3ba8cc17](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/9a4651e754f70b12e397694ffc41f44c3ba8cc17)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)

This data is provided by [OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-4c39-4ccg-62r3) and the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Cache confusion of response bodies for requests with bodies
[CVE-2026-64648](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64648) / [GHSA-68g3-v927-f742](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-68g3-v927-f742)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A server-side `fetch` with a request body may return a cached **response** body from a different request to the same URL but different body. Confidential data in the `POST`'s **response** body would then leak to unauthorized requests. Though the request itself will not be deduped.

This only applies to `fetch` calls with a request that has a different init than the one passed to `fetch`.
Safe: `fetch(new Request(init), init)`
Unsafe: `fetch(new Request(init), aDifferentInit)`

##### Workarounds

No workaround exists besides upgrading. Applications using Pages Router are not vulnerable.

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.0 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-68g3-v927-f742](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-68g3-v927-f742)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/062f66700b52a5d6bba2c0605d55577ab7ad262c](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/062f66700b52a5d6bba2c0605d55577ab7ad262c)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/73b94872bc343d09494b50394d8c08eb9fc8e56a](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/73b94872bc343d09494b50394d8c08eb9fc8e56a)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)

This data is provided by [OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-68g3-v927-f742) and the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Middleware / Proxy bypass in App Router applications using Turbopack and single locale
[CVE-2026-64642](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64642) / [GHSA-6gpp-xcg3-4w24](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-6gpp-xcg3-4w24)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

Crafted requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router built with Turbopack and a **single** entry in `config.i18n.locales` can bypass middleware/proxy based authentication.

##### Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, enforce authorization in the page's server-side data path instead of relying solely on middleware.

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 8.3 / 10 (High)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-6gpp-xcg3-4w24](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-6gpp-xcg3-4w24)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/96014](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/96014)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/6bf4df14508ad6c0cd46af50c6051ee42f2d9151](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/6bf4df14508ad6c0cd46af50c6051ee42f2d9151)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)

This data is provided by [OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-6gpp-xcg3-4w24) and the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in Server Actions on custom servers
[CVE-2026-64649](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64649) / [GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

When a Server Action forwards or redirects a request, an attacker can cause the server to send that outbound request to a malicious host (Server-Side Request Forgery). This requires the attacker's request to control Host-associated headers. In some configurations, it's also possible to obtain internal values that weaken middleware/proxy authorization.

Applications that use Server Actions are affected when the incoming host header is not fixed to a trusted value. This typically occurs on custom servers, or on deployments not behind a proxy that pins the host. Managed hosting pins the host upstream and is not affected; `next start` and standalone output do the same from version 14.2 onward.

##### Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade, ensure clients do not control the host header your application receives. Pin or validate `Host` and `X-Forwarded-Host` at your edge or proxy. On version 14.2.0 and later, you can additionally set the `__NEXT_PRIVATE_ORIGIN` environment variable to your deployment's real origin:

```bash
__NEXT_PRIVATE_ORIGIN=https://www.example.com node server.js

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 8.3 / 10 (High)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/b51206321854193208c0805ba42acc49287f942b](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/b51206321854193208c0805ba42acc49287f942b)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/e3e5666ccead3a15162793d697af5e48b7cc0498](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/e3e5666ccead3a15162793d697af5e48b7cc0498)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)

This data is provided by [OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-89xv-2m56-2m9x) and the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Unauthenticated disclosure of internal Server Function endpoints
[CVE-2026-64643](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64643) / [GHSA-955p-x3mx-jcvp](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-955p-x3mx-jcvp)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

In Next.js applications using App Router, Server Actions (`use server`) or `use cache` endpoints can be disclosed bypassing any authentication on the pages where these endpoints are usually used.

Server Action IDs can be disclosed to unauthenticated users via publicly served client artifacts (for example, static chunks containing action references).

Affected users are applications using App Router + Server Actions.  

By itself, this disclosure is typically a recon/enumeration primitive; however, it can increase risk when combined with other weaknesses.
 

##### Workarounds

Never assume any authentication claims at the `use cache` or `use server` boundary. Always authenticate within the boundary.

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-955p-x3mx-jcvp](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-955p-x3mx-jcvp)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/1b0c3ae912a3ad925c60065cc8d55b070fa8bcd3](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/1b0c3ae912a3ad925c60065cc8d55b070fa8bcd3)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/ff12a6124e1504f17b62de948b8a553fdecaef7b](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/ff12a6124e1504f17b62de948b8a553fdecaef7b)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)

This data is provided by [OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-955p-x3mx-jcvp) and the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Denial of Service in App Router using Server Actions
[CVE-2026-64641](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64641) / [GHSA-m99w-x7hq-7vfj](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-m99w-x7hq-7vfj)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

Crafted requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router with at least one Server Action can lead to excessive CPU usage blocking processing of further requests in the same process.

##### Workarounds

No workaround exists besides upgrading. Applications using Pages Router or not using Server Actions are not vulnerable.

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 8.2 / 10 (High)
- Vector String: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`

#### References
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-m99w-x7hq-7vfj](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-m99w-x7hq-7vfj)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/96013](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/96013)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/019628571641dec57aaf349ba0c360e3964e6f12](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/019628571641dec57aaf349ba0c360e3964e6f12)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.21)
- [https://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11](https://redirect.github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.2.11)

This data is provided by [OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-m99w-x7hq-7vfj) and the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database) ([CC-BY 4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in rewrites via attacker-controlled destination hostname
[CVE-2026-64645](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64645) / [GHSA-p9j2-gv94-2wf4](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-p9j2-gv94-2wf4)

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A `rewrites()` or `redirects()` rule that builds its external destination hostname from request-controlled input can be pointed at an arbitrary hostname, regardless of the rule's hostname suffix. For a rewrite, Next.js proxies the request to that arbitrary host and serves the response from the application's origin, leading to Server-Side Request forgery. A `redirects()` rule configured this way is vulnerable to an Open Redirect.

This affects any destination that puts a dynamic segment in the hostname, whether from the path:

```javascript
// next.config.js
module.exports = {
  async rewrites() {
    return [
      {
        source: '/:tenant',
        destination: 'https://:tenant.api.example.com',
      },
    ]
  },
}

or from a has capture:

// next.config.js
module.exports = {
  async rewrites() {
    return [
      {
        source: '/',
        has: [{ type: 'query', key: 'region', value: '(?<region>.+)' }],
        destination: 'https://:region.api.example.com',
      },
    ]
  },
}
Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, do not build the hostname of an external rewrites() or redirects() destination from user-controlled input. If a dynamic subdomain is required, constrain the value to hostname-safe characters: value: '(?<region>[a-z0-9-]+)'.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.3 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Next.js: Denial of Service in the Image Optimization API using SVGs

CVE-2026-64644 / GHSA-q8wf-6r8g-63ch

More information

Details

Impact

When self-hosting Next.js with the default image loader, the Image Optimization API can optimize remotely hosted images if configured (not enabled by default). If those images contain malicious content, they can cause CPU exhaustion in /_next/image endpoints.

  • If you are using config.images.remotePatterns, only the patterns in that array are impacted.
  • If you are using config.images.unoptimized: true, you are NOT impacted.
  • If you are using config.images.loader: 'custom', you are NOT impacted.
  • If you are using Vercel, you are NOT impacted.
Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, you can avoid the expensive work by setting config.experimental.imgOptSkipMetadata : true.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Release Notes

vercel/next.js (next)

v16.2.11

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/London)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
chore(deps): update dependency next to v16.2.11 [security]
83b72a9 
Signed-off-by: Renovate Bot <renovate-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file ok-to-test labels Jul 23, 2026
@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow Bot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO sign-off message. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 23, 2026
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for cert-manager ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 83b72a9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cert-manager/deploys/6a6160d22f95520008971ff7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2213--cert-manager.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@wallrj-cyberark
wallrj-cyberark requested a review from wallrj July 28, 2026 15:31
@wallrj

wallrj commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 28, 2026
@cert-manager-prow

cert-manager-prow Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wallrj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cert-manager-prow cert-manager-prow Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 28, 2026
@cert-manager-prow
cert-manager-prow Bot merged commit d2dc7c2 into master Jul 28, 2026
7 checks passed
@renovate
renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-next-vulnerability branch July 28, 2026 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wallrj wallrj Awaiting requested review from wallrj

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO sign-off message. dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@wallrj