Skip to content

Add read-only Meta enforcement monitoring routes - #588

Closed
pcauhi wants to merge 1 commit into
browser-use:mainfrom
pcauhi:agent/facebook-enforcement-monitoring
Closed

Add read-only Meta enforcement monitoring routes#588
pcauhi wants to merge 1 commit into
browser-use:mainfrom
pcauhi:agent/facebook-enforcement-monitoring

Conversation

@pcauhi

@pcauhi pcauhi commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • document direct routes for Meta Business Support, Facebook Account Status, Identity Confirmation, and Support Inbox
  • capture the /support/ redirect trap and the canonical Support Inbox route
  • distinguish similarly named Business Support tabs and add safe read-only boundaries

Verification

  • verified the documented routes and visible anchors against a logged-in Chrome session
  • confirmed the Support Inbox category URL patterns and item_id link shape
  • no Meta settings, support cases, appeals, verification flows, or business assets were changed

Summary by cubic

Adds a read-only guide for monitoring Facebook/Meta enforcement surfaces with verified direct routes and safe navigation. Clarifies the Support Inbox redirect trap and sets clear boundaries to avoid creating cases or changing settings.

  • New Features
    • Documented direct URLs for Business Support Home (user/business), Account Status, Identity Confirmation, and Support Inbox tabs.
    • Explained the Support Inbox route trap and how to find the canonical link from the profile menu.
    • Listed stable on-page anchors to capture and noted non-interactive restriction cards.
    • Outlined support-case checks and strict read-only boundaries (no appeals, verification, or settings changes).

Written for commit a8f72ea. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

@browser-harness-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Skill review passed

Reviewed 1 file(s) — no findings.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 issue found across 1 file

Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="domain-skills/facebook/enforcement-monitoring.md">

<violation number="1" location="domain-skills/facebook/enforcement-monitoring.md:15">
P2: The documented URLs are internally inconsistent with the skill's own 'Support Inbox route trap' warning. The trap section tells agents to use the no-slash form `support?ref=contextual` because `support/` (with trailing slash) 'can redirect to `/hacked`', yet the Direct routes table and the Support-case checks section prescribe the slash form for `support/?tab_type=APPEALS`, `support/?tab_type=REPORTS`, and `support/?item_id=...`. An agent following the doc to construct tab/item URLs may hit exactly the redirect the skill warns against. Please either align all Support Inbox URLs to one consistent form or explicitly state why the slash-before-query form is safe for `?tab_type=`/`?item_id=` while the bare `support/` form is not.</violation>
</file>

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic

| Facebook Account Status | `https://www.facebook.com/account_status` |
| Identity Confirmation | `https://www.facebook.com/id/hub/` |
| Facebook Support Inbox | `https://www.facebook.com/support?ref=contextual` |
| Support Inbox — alerts/appeals | `https://www.facebook.com/support/?tab_type=APPEALS` |

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2: The documented URLs are internally inconsistent with the skill's own 'Support Inbox route trap' warning. The trap section tells agents to use the no-slash form support?ref=contextual because support/ (with trailing slash) 'can redirect to /hacked', yet the Direct routes table and the Support-case checks section prescribe the slash form for support/?tab_type=APPEALS, support/?tab_type=REPORTS, and support/?item_id=.... An agent following the doc to construct tab/item URLs may hit exactly the redirect the skill warns against. Please either align all Support Inbox URLs to one consistent form or explicitly state why the slash-before-query form is safe for ?tab_type=/?item_id= while the bare support/ form is not.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At domain-skills/facebook/enforcement-monitoring.md, line 15:

<comment>The documented URLs are internally inconsistent with the skill's own 'Support Inbox route trap' warning. The trap section tells agents to use the no-slash form `support?ref=contextual` because `support/` (with trailing slash) 'can redirect to `/hacked`', yet the Direct routes table and the Support-case checks section prescribe the slash form for `support/?tab_type=APPEALS`, `support/?tab_type=REPORTS`, and `support/?item_id=...`. An agent following the doc to construct tab/item URLs may hit exactly the redirect the skill warns against. Please either align all Support Inbox URLs to one consistent form or explicitly state why the slash-before-query form is safe for `?tab_type=`/`?item_id=` while the bare `support/` form is not.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+| Facebook Account Status | `https://www.facebook.com/account_status` |
+| Identity Confirmation | `https://www.facebook.com/id/hub/` |
+| Facebook Support Inbox | `https://www.facebook.com/support?ref=contextual` |
+| Support Inbox — alerts/appeals | `https://www.facebook.com/support/?tab_type=APPEALS` |
+| Support Inbox — reports | `https://www.facebook.com/support/?tab_type=REPORTS` |
+
</file context>
Fix with cubic

@pcauhi pcauhi closed this by deleting the head repository Aug 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant