[scan] Partial Autograd support#4
Open
bohnstingl wants to merge 12 commits into
Open
Conversation
ydwu4
reviewed
Oct 11, 2024
| def test_scan_closure_RNN_partial_autograd(self, reverse, compile_mode, device): | ||
| import random | ||
|
|
||
| torch._dynamo.reset() |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: if we split the autograd tests using parametrize, we could avoid the reset and changing the cache size.
I guess we could do
@parametrize("partial_grad", ["xs", "init", "additional_inputs", "complex", "random"])
We can save the all requires grad tests as they're tested elsewhere.
| if isinstance(gm, bool): | ||
| return gm | ||
|
|
||
| def _detect_output_alias(gm): |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could merge this function with _has_potential_branch_input_alias (change its anme to _has_potential_bracnh_input_outputs_alias, to avoid tracing the subgraph multiple times
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I merged the functionalities as you suggested and updated all the usages.
ydwu4
reviewed
Oct 11, 2024
ydwu4
left a comment
ydwu4
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I scan through the change quickly. This is in the right direction of what we disscussed offline. Will do a more thorough reviewing when the jit inductor support, and autograd support is landed. Thanks for making this happen!
*) Parametrized test to avoid manually increasing compiler cache size
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2024
…ytorch#139659) ### Motivation Today, watchdog only reports that it found a collective timeout: ``` [rank1]:[E1104 14:02:18.767594328 ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:688] [Rank 1] Watchdog caught collective operation timeout: WorkNCCL(SeqNum=1, OpType=ALLREDUCE, NumelIn=200, NumelOut=200, Timeout(ms)=5000) ran for 5096 milliseconds before timing out. ``` While this is nice, it is hard to associate the error with user's program or library stack. ### This PR This PR gives watchdog the ability to report the call-time stack of the collective, so that it would be easier to track the error back to the program's behavior. The call-time stack was recorded by Flight Recorder with minimal overhead (for details, please read this [doc](https://dev-discuss.pytorch.org/t/fast-combined-c-python-torchscript-inductor-tracebacks/1158) written by @zdevito ). In `ProcessGroupNCCL`, we are only tracking / reporting the python part so that it fits most PyTorch users. ### Demo [stack_demo.py](https://gist.github.com/kwen2501/6758e18d305d67fc6f3f926217825c09). ``` TORCH_NCCL_TRACE_BUFFER_SIZE=100 torchrun --nproc-per-node 2 stack_demo.py ``` `TORCH_NCCL_TRACE_BUFFER_SIZE` is for turning on the Flight Recorder. Output: ``` [rank0]:[E1104 14:19:27.591610653 ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:695] Stack trace of the timedout collective operation: #0 all_reduce from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:2696 #1 wrapper from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/c10d_logger.py:83 #2 bar from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:15 #3 foo from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:24 #4 main from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:34 #5 <module> from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:40 [rank1]:[E1104 14:19:27.771430164 ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:695] Stack trace of the timedout collective operation: #0 all_gather_into_tensor from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py:3630 #1 wrapper from /data/users/kw2501/pytorch/torch/distributed/c10d_logger.py:83 #2 baz from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:20 #3 foo from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:26 #4 main from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:34 #5 <module> from /data/users/kw2501/sync_async/repro.py:40 ``` From the log above, we can tell that `bar()` and `baz()` are the places where the two ranks divert. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#139659 Approved by: https://github.com/wconstab, https://github.com/fduwjj
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
See pytorch#140725 (comment) Running `torch.mps.synchronize()` after metal kernel resulted in infinite wait inside `[_MTLCommandBuffer waitUntilCompleted]` ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP * frame #0: 0x00000001aa919084 Metal`pthread_cond_wait + 12 frame #1: 0x00000001aa78b1b4 Metal`-[_MTLCommandBuffer waitUntilCompleted] + 84 frame #2: 0x00000001032bf358 libtorch_python.dylib`torch::mps::MPSModule_deviceSynchronize(_object*, _object*) + 40 frame #3: 0x0000000100e94c20 Python`cfunction_vectorcall_NOARGS + 100 frame #4: 0x0000000100e389b8 Python`PyObject_Vectorcall + 92 frame #5: 0x0000000100f61e38 Python`_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault + 19040 frame #6: 0x0000000100f5d180 Python`PyEval_EvalCode + 200 frame pytorch#7: 0x0000000100fcd1a4 Python`run_eval_code_obj + 104 frame pytorch#8: 0x0000000100fccbe4 Python`run_mod + 168 frame pytorch#9: 0x0000000100fcb518 Python`pyrun_file + 164 frame pytorch#10: 0x0000000100fca854 Python`_PyRun_SimpleFileObject + 256 frame pytorch#11: 0x0000000100fca4e8 Python`_PyRun_AnyFileObject + 80 frame pytorch#12: 0x0000000100ff2028 Python`pymain_run_file_obj + 164 frame pytorch#13: 0x0000000100ff1ce4 Python`pymain_run_file + 72 frame pytorch#14: 0x0000000100ff0f74 Python`Py_RunMain + 988 frame pytorch#15: 0x0000000100ff1564 Python`pymain_main + 304 frame pytorch#16: 0x0000000100ff1604 Python`Py_BytesMain + 40 frame pytorch#17: 0x000000019f630274 dyld`start + 2840 ``` Pull Request resolved: pytorch#141296 Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2025
…143550) # Motivation Fix pytorch#143543 # Solution We should raise python exception instead of aborting... # Additional Context without this PR: ```python >>> import torch >>> torch.accelerator.current_stream(torch.accelerator.device_count()) terminate called after throwing an instance of 'c10::Error' what(): device is out of range, device is 2, total number of device is 2. Exception raised from check_device_index at /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/c10/xpu/XPUFunctions.h:36 (most recent call first): frame #0: c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) + 0xac (0x7f30707eb95c in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10.so) frame #1: c10::detail::torchCheckFail(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 0xf3 (0x7f307078fc57 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10.so) frame #2: <unknown function> + 0x19a3e (0x7f3070c2ba3e in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10_xpu.so) frame #3: c10::xpu::getCurrentXPUStream(signed char) + 0x2f (0x7f3070c2c83f in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10_xpu.so) frame #4: <unknown function> + 0x1ca35 (0x7f3070c2ea35 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libc10_xpu.so) frame #5: <unknown function> + 0x653f15 (0x7f3083391f15 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so) frame #6: <unknown function> + 0x39e5f2 (0x7f30830dc5f2 in /home/dvrogozh/git/pytorch/pytorch/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so) <omitting python frames> frame pytorch#20: <unknown function> + 0x29d90 (0x7f308b19bd90 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6) frame pytorch#21: __libc_start_main + 0x80 (0x7f308b19be40 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6) Aborted (core dumped) ``` with this PR: ```python >>> import torch >>> torch.accelerator.current_stream(torch.accelerator.device_count()) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/home/pt-gpu/4T-4652/guangyey/stock-pytorch/torch/accelerator/__init__.py", line 123, in current_stream return torch._C._accelerator_getStream(device_index) RuntimeError: The device index is out of range. It must be in [0, 2), but got 2. ``` Pull Request resolved: pytorch#143550 Approved by: https://github.com/EikanWang, https://github.com/dvrogozh, https://github.com/albanD
This was referenced Feb 3, 2025
Owner
Author
|
This PR will be combined with pytorch#135631 and pursued further in pytorch#146285 |
pytorchmergebot
pushed a commit
to pytorch/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2025
This PR introduces the Autograd feature for scan with partial gradient support. It is a combination of the already opened PRs: #135631 and bohnstingl#4 Pull Request resolved: #146285 Approved by: https://github.com/ydwu4 Co-authored-by: Yidi Wu <yidi@meta.com>
timocafe
pushed a commit
to timocafe/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2025
This PR introduces the Autograd feature for scan with partial gradient support. It is a combination of the already opened PRs: pytorch#135631 and bohnstingl#4 Pull Request resolved: pytorch#146285 Approved by: https://github.com/ydwu4 Co-authored-by: Yidi Wu <yidi@meta.com>
amathewc
pushed a commit
to amathewc/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
This PR introduces the Autograd feature for scan with partial gradient support. It is a combination of the already opened PRs: pytorch#135631 and bohnstingl#4 Pull Request resolved: pytorch#146285 Approved by: https://github.com/ydwu4 Co-authored-by: Yidi Wu <yidi@meta.com>
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
Which inherits from `RuntimeError` and contains `error_code`, which in case of CUDA should contain error returned by `cudaGetLastError` `torch::detail::_new_accelerator_error_object(c10::AcceleratorError&)` follows the pattern of CPython's [`PyErr_SetString`](https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/cb8a72b301f47e76d93a7fe5b259e9a5758792e1/Python/errors.c#L282), namely - Convert cstr into Python string with `PyUnicode_FromString` - Create new exception object using `PyObject_CallOneArg` just like it's done in [`_PyErr_CreateException`](https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/cb8a72b301f47e76d93a7fe5b259e9a5758792e1/Python/errors.c#L32) - Set `error_code` property using `PyObject_SetAttrString` - decref all temporary references Test that it works and captures CPP backtrace (in addition to CI) by running ```python import os os.environ['TORCH_SHOW_CPP_STACKTRACES'] = '1' import torch x = torch.rand(10, device="cuda") y = torch.arange(20, device="cuda") try: x[y] = 2 print(x) except torch.AcceleratorError as e: print("Exception was raised", e.args[0]) print("Captured error code is ", e.error_code) ``` which produces following output ``` Exception was raised CUDA error: device-side assert triggered CUDA kernel errors might be asynchronously reported at some other API call, so the stacktrace below might be incorrect. For debugging consider passing CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1 Compile with `TORCH_USE_CUDA_DSA` to enable device-side assertions. Exception raised from c10_cuda_check_implementation at /home/ubuntu/pytorch/c10/cuda/CUDAException.cpp:41 (most recent call first): C++ CapturedTraceback: #4 std::_Function_handler<std::shared_ptr<c10::LazyValue<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > const> (), c10::SetStackTraceFetcher(std::function<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > ()>)::{lambda()#1}>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) from Logging.cpp:0 #5 c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) from ??:0 #6 c10::cuda::c10_cuda_check_implementation(int, char const*, char const*, int, bool) [clone .cold] from CUDAException.cpp:0 pytorch#7 void at::native::gpu_kernel_impl<at::native::AbsFunctor<float> >(at::TensorIteratorBase&, at::native::AbsFunctor<float> const&) [clone .isra.0] from tmpxft_000191fc_00000000-6_AbsKernel.cudafe1.cpp:0 pytorch#8 at::native::abs_kernel_cuda(at::TensorIteratorBase&) from ??:0 pytorch#9 at::Tensor& at::native::unary_op_impl_with_complex_to_float_out<at::native::abs_stub_DECLARE_DISPATCH_type>(at::Tensor&, at::Tensor const&, at::native::abs_stub_DECLARE_DISPATCH_type&, bool) [clone .constprop.0] from UnaryOps.cpp:0 pytorch#10 at::(anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::wrapper_CUDA_out_abs_out(at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor&) from RegisterCUDA_0.cpp:0 pytorch#11 at::_ops::abs_out::call(at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor&) from ??:0 pytorch#12 at::native::abs(at::Tensor const&) from ??:0 pytorch#13 c10::impl::wrap_kernel_functor_unboxed_<c10::impl::detail::WrapFunctionIntoFunctor_<c10::CompileTimeFunctionPointer<at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&), &at::(anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::wrapper_CompositeExplicitAutograd__abs>, at::Tensor, c10::guts::typelist::typelist<at::Tensor const&> >, at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&)>::call(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&) from RegisterCompositeExplicitAutograd_0.cpp:0 pytorch#14 at::_ops::abs::redispatch(c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&) from ??:0 pytorch#15 torch::autograd::VariableType::(anonymous namespace)::abs(c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&) from VariableType_1.cpp:0 pytorch#16 c10::impl::wrap_kernel_functor_unboxed_<c10::impl::detail::WrapFunctionIntoFunctor_<c10::CompileTimeFunctionPointer<at::Tensor (c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&), &torch::autograd::VariableType::(anonymous namespace)::abs>, at::Tensor, c10::guts::typelist::typelist<c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&> >, at::Tensor (c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&)>::call(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&) from VariableType_1.cpp:0 pytorch#17 at::_ops::abs::call(at::Tensor const&) from ??:0 pytorch#18 at::native::isfinite(at::Tensor const&) from ??:0 pytorch#19 c10::impl::wrap_kernel_functor_unboxed_<c10::impl::detail::WrapFunctionIntoFunctor_<c10::CompileTimeFunctionPointer<at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&), &at::(anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::wrapper_CompositeImplicitAutograd__isfinite>, at::Tensor, c10::guts::typelist::typelist<at::Tensor const&> >, at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&)>::call(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&) from RegisterCompositeImplicitAutograd_0.cpp:0 pytorch#20 at::_ops::isfinite::call(at::Tensor const&) from ??:0 pytorch#21 torch::autograd::THPVariable_isfinite(_object*, _object*, _object*) from python_torch_functions_2.cpp:0 pytorch#22 PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs from ??:0 pytorch#23 _PyObject_MakeTpCall from ??:0 pytorch#24 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault from ??:0 pytorch#25 _PyObject_FastCallDictTstate from ??:0 pytorch#26 _PyStack_AsDict from ??:0 pytorch#27 _PyObject_MakeTpCall from ??:0 pytorch#28 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault from ??:0 pytorch#29 _PyFunction_Vectorcall from ??:0 pytorch#30 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault from ??:0 pytorch#31 _PyFunction_Vectorcall from ??:0 pytorch#32 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault from ??:0 pytorch#33 _PyFunction_Vectorcall from ??:0 pytorch#34 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault from ??:0 pytorch#35 PyFrame_GetCode from ??:0 pytorch#36 PyNumber_Xor from ??:0 pytorch#37 PyObject_Str from ??:0 pytorch#38 PyFile_WriteObject from ??:0 pytorch#39 _PyWideStringList_AsList from ??:0 pytorch#40 _PyDict_NewPresized from ??:0 pytorch#41 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault from ??:0 pytorch#42 PyEval_EvalCode from ??:0 pytorch#43 PyEval_EvalCode from ??:0 pytorch#44 PyUnicode_Tailmatch from ??:0 pytorch#45 PyInit__collections from ??:0 pytorch#46 PyUnicode_Tailmatch from ??:0 pytorch#47 _PyRun_SimpleFileObject from ??:0 pytorch#48 _PyRun_AnyFileObject from ??:0 pytorch#49 Py_RunMain from ??:0 pytorch#50 Py_BytesMain from ??:0 pytorch#51 __libc_init_first from ??:0 pytorch#52 __libc_start_main from ??:0 pytorch#53 _start from ??:0 Captured error code is 710 ``` Pull Request resolved: pytorch#152023 Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/mradmila, https://github.com/ngimel ghstack dependencies: pytorch#154436
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2025
…torch#156600) Don't call `sum()` on a tensor that is default constructed. Previously we could call `sum()` on a tensor that was default-contructed. That would lead to an error like this: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/ahmads/.conda/envs/pt3/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 58, in testPartExecutor yield File "/home/ahmads/.conda/envs/pt3/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 634, in run self._callTestMethod(testMethod) File "/home/ahmads/.conda/envs/pt3/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 589, in _callTestMethod if method() is not None: ^^^^^^^^ File "/home/ahmads/personal/pytorch/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 3191, in wrapper method(*args, **kwargs) File "/home/ahmads/personal/pytorch/test/test_nn.py", line 7235, in test_layer_norm_backwards_eps ln_out_cuda.backward(grad_output_cuda) File "/home/ahmads/personal/pytorch/torch/_tensor.py", line 647, in backward torch.autograd.backward( File "/home/ahmads/personal/pytorch/torch/autograd/__init__.py", line 354, in backward _engine_run_backward( File "/home/ahmads/personal/pytorch/torch/autograd/graph.py", line 829, in _engine_run_backward return Variable._execution_engine.run_backward( # Calls into the C++ engine to run the backward pass ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RuntimeError: tensor does not have a device Exception raised from device_default at /home/ahmads/personal/pytorch/c10/core/TensorImpl.h:1265 (most recent call first): C++ CapturedTraceback: #4 std::_Function_handler<std::shared_ptr<c10::LazyValue<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > const> (), c10::SetStackTraceFetcher(std::function<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > ()>)::{lambda()#1}>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) from Logging.cpp:0 #5 c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) from ??:0 #6 c10::detail::torchCheckFail(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, char const*) from ??:0 pytorch#7 at::TensorBase::options() const from :0 pytorch#8 at::meta::resize_reduction(at::impl::MetaBase&, at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, c10::ScalarType, bool) from :0 pytorch#9 at::meta::structured_sum_dim_IntList::meta(at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, std::optional<c10::ScalarType>) from ??:0 pytorch#10 at::(anonymous namespace)::wrapper_CompositeExplicitAutogradNonFunctional_sum_dim_IntList(at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, std::optional<c10::ScalarType>) from RegisterCompositeExplicitAutogradNonFunctional_0.cpp:0 pytorch#11 c10::impl::wrap_kernel_functor_unboxed_<c10::impl::detail::WrapFunctionIntoFunctor_<c10::CompileTimeFunctionPointer<at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, std::optional<c10::ScalarType>), &at::(anonymous namespace)::wrapper_CompositeExplicitAutogradNonFunctional_sum_dim_IntList>, at::Tensor, c10::guts::typelist::typelist<at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, std::optional<c10::ScalarType> > >, at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, std::optional<c10::ScalarType>)>::call(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, std::optional<c10::ScalarType>) from RegisterCompositeExplicitAutogradNonFunctional_0.cpp:0 pytorch#12 at::_ops::sum_dim_IntList::call(at::Tensor const&, c10::OptionalArrayRef<long>, bool, std::optional<c10::ScalarType>) from ??:0 pytorch#13 void at::native::(anonymous namespace)::LaunchGammaBetaBackwardCUDAKernel<float, float>(float const*, float const*, float const*, float const*, long, long, at::Tensor*, at::Tensor*, CUstream_st*) from ??:0 pytorch#14 void at::native::(anonymous namespace)::LayerNormBackwardKernelImplInternal<float>(at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, long, long, at::Tensor*, at::Tensor*, at::Tensor*) from ??:0 pytorch#15 at::native::(anonymous namespace)::LayerNormBackwardKernelImpl(at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, long, long, at::Tensor*, at::Tensor*, at::Tensor*) from ??:0 pytorch#16 at::native::layer_norm_backward_cuda(at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<long>, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, std::optional<at::Tensor> const&, std::optional<at::Tensor> const&, std::array<bool, 3ul>) from ??:0 pytorch#17 at::(anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::wrapper_CUDA__native_layer_norm_backward(at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, at::Tensor const&, at::Tensor const&, std::optional<at::Tensor> const&, std::optional<at::Tensor> const&, std::array<bool, 3ul>) from RegisterCUDA_0.cpp:0 ``` Now we only call `sum(0)` on tensors that are defined and properly guard the `sum(0)` and assignment. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#156600 Approved by: https://github.com/eqy, https://github.com/ngimel
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
For tensor with non-zero offset, it must be multiplied by element size Add regression test by creating Tensor in array of 6 elements with offset 3, which before the fix crashed with ``` C++ exception with description "setStorage: sizes [3, 3], strides [0, 1], storage offset 3, and itemsize 4 requiring a storage size of 24 are out of bounds for storage of size 15 Exception raised from checkInBoundsForStorage at /Users/nshulga/git/pytorch/pytorch/aten/src/ATen/native/Resize.h:123 (most recent call first): frame #0: c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>) + 56 (0x104a9cd44 in libc10.dylib) frame #1: c10::detail::torchCheckFail(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>> const&) + 120 (0x104a9a05c in libc10.dylib) frame #2: void at::native::checkInBoundsForStorage<long long>(c10::ArrayRef<long long>, c10::ArrayRef<long long>, long long, caffe2::TypeMeta const&, c10::Storage const&) + 656 (0x111dbd314 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame #3: void at::native::setStrided<long long>(at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<long long>, c10::ArrayRef<long long>, long long) + 152 (0x111dcd22c in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame #4: at::native::as_strided_tensorimpl(at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<long long>, c10::ArrayRef<long long>, std::__1::optional<long long>) + 312 (0x111dccf98 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame #5: c10::impl::wrap_kernel_functor_unboxed_<c10::impl::detail::WrapFunctionIntoFunctor_<c10::CompileTimeFunctionPointer<at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, std::__1::optional<c10::SymInt>), &at::(anonymous namespace)::(anonymous namespace)::wrapper_CPU__as_strided(at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, std::__1::optional<c10::SymInt>)>, at::Tensor, c10::guts::typelist::typelist<at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, std::__1::optional<c10::SymInt>>>, at::Tensor (at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, std::__1::optional<c10::SymInt>)>::call(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, std::__1::optional<c10::SymInt>) + 104 (0x1129a1e94 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame #6: at::_ops::as_strided::call(at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, std::__1::optional<c10::SymInt>) + 476 (0x112200ad0 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame pytorch#7: at::Tensor::as_strided(c10::ArrayRef<long long>, c10::ArrayRef<long long>, std::__1::optional<long long>) const + 236 (0x1115db098 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame pytorch#8: at::native::expand(at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<long long>, bool) + 348 (0x111dcc0d4 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame pytorch#9: c10::impl::wrap_kernel_functor_unboxed_<c10::impl::detail::WrapFunctionIntoFunctor_<c10::CompileTimeFunctionPointer<at::Tensor (c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool), &torch::ADInplaceOrView::(anonymous namespace)::expand(c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool)>, at::Tensor, c10::guts::typelist::typelist<c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool>>, at::Tensor (c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool)>::call(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool) + 116 (0x1157ac410 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame pytorch#10: c10::impl::wrap_kernel_functor_unboxed_<c10::impl::detail::WrapFunctionIntoFunctor_<c10::CompileTimeFunctionPointer<at::Tensor (c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool), &torch::autograd::VariableType::(anonymous namespace)::expand(c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool)>, at::Tensor, c10::guts::typelist::typelist<c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool>>, at::Tensor (c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool)>::call(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::DispatchKeySet, at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool) + 992 (0x114e8b010 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame pytorch#11: at::_ops::expand::call(at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<c10::SymInt>, bool) + 316 (0x112743c90 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) frame pytorch#12: at::expand_size(at::Tensor const&, c10::ArrayRef<long long>) + 164 (0x1047d82b4 in basic) frame pytorch#13: BasicTest_TestForBlobResizeCPU_Test::TestBody() + 284 (0x1047d8048 in basic) ``` Pull Request resolved: pytorch#158690 Approved by: https://github.com/angelayi
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2025
…rch#165479) These happen when building with CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithAssert This should fix two types of failures that started with pytorch#163665 Disclaimer that I used a lot of AI since I don't how pybind works or what refcounts and pointers are, so idk if this is a good solution, or even a solution at all (fwiw the tests pass now) The first one type is Truncated: ``` default_pg, _ = _new_process_group_helper( File "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/distributed/distributed_c10d.py", line 2096, in _new_process_group_helper backend_class = creator_fn(dist_backend_opts, backend_options) File "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/testing/_internal/distributed/fake_pg.py", line 25, in _create_fake_pg return FakeProcessGroup._create_internal( RuntimeError: new_refcount != 1 INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at "/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/c10/util/intrusive_ptr.h":319, please report a bug to PyTorch. intrusive_ptr: Cannot increase refcount after it reached zero. Exception raised from retain_ at /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/c10/util/intrusive_ptr.h:319 (most recent call first): C++ CapturedTraceback: #4 std::_Function_handler<std::shared_ptr<c10::LazyValue<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > const> (), c10::SetStackTraceFetcher(std::function<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > ()>)::{lambda()#1}>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) from Logging.cpp:0 #5 c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) from ??:0 #6 c10::detail::torchCheckFail(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) from ??:0 pytorch#7 c10::detail::torchInternalAssertFail(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, char const*, char const*) from ??:0 pytorch#8 void pybind11::class_<c10d::FakeProcessGroup, (anonymous namespace)::IntrusivePtrNoGilDestructor<c10d::FakeProcessGroup> >::init_instance<(anonymous namespace)::IntrusivePtrNoGilDestructor<c10d::FakeProcessGroup>, 0>(pybind11::detail::instance*, void const*) from init.cpp:0 pytorch#9 pybind11::detail::type_caster_generic::cast(void const*, pybind11::return_value_policy, pybind11::handle, pybind11::detail::type_info const*, void* (*)(void const*), void* (*)(void const*), void const*) from :0 pytorch#10 pybind11::cpp_function::initialize<torch::distributed::c10d::(anonymous namespace)::c10d_init(_object*, _object*)::{lambda(int, int, c10::intrusive_ptr<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options, c10::detail::intrusive_target_default_null_type<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options> >)pytorch#127}, c10::intrusive_ptr<c10d::FakeProcessGroup, c10::detail::intrusive_target_default_null_type<c10d::FakeProcessGroup> >, int, int, c10::intrusive_ptr<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options, c10::detail::intrusive_target_default_null_type<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options> >, pybind11::name, pybind11::scope, pybind11::sibling, pybind11::arg, pybind11::arg, pybind11::arg_v>(torch::distributed::c10d::(anonymous namespace)::c10d_init(_object*, _object*)::{lambda(int, int, c10::intrusive_ptr<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options, c10::detail::intrusive_target_default_null_type<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options> >)pytorch#127}&&, c10::intrusive_ptr<c10d::FakeProcessGroup, c10::detail::intrusive_target_default_null_type<c10d::FakeProcessGroup> > (*)(int, int, c10::intrusive_ptr<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options, c10::detail::intrusive_target_default_null_type<c10d::FakeProcessGroup::Options> >), pybind11::name const&, pybind11::scope const&, pybind11::sibling const&, pybind11::arg const&, pybind11::arg const&, pybind11::arg_v const&)::{lambda(pybind11::detail::function_call&)#3}::_FUN(pybind11::detail::function_call&) from init.cpp:0 ``` and I fix it here by getting rid of `DontIncreaseRefcount` and using make_intrusive to do the ref count handling instead. However, I also had to move the constructor to be public, which I think is not good, based on the reasoning of the original PR The other one type is ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/test/test_testing.py", line 2415, in test_no_warning_on_import self.assertEqual(out, "") File "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 4233, in assertEqual raise error_metas.pop()[0].to_error( # type: ignore[index] AssertionError: String comparison failed: "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/s[352 chars]):\n" != '' - /opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/distributed/__init__.py:29: FutureWarning: pybind11-bound class 'torch._C._distributed_c10d.FakeProcessGroup' is using an old-style placement-new '__init__' which has been deprecated. See the upgrade guide in pybind11's docs. This message is only visible when compiled in debug mode. - if is_available() and not torch._C._c10d_init(): To execute this test, run the following from the base repo dir: python test/test_testing.py TestImports.test_no_warning_on_import ``` which I fix by getting rid of the `__init__` which I think is ok since it'll just error if you try to make one? Pull Request resolved: pytorch#165479 Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2025
Previously g3 = NVIDIA Tesla M60
Now g6 = NVIDIA L4
Also change cuda arch list accordingly
Pros:
More memory, newer GPU
Cons:
That was one of the few remaining tests on g3 runners, so we probably lost coverage?
We can probably run more tests in parallel now but I'm not going to do that here
Disabled a bunch of sparse tests and nestedtensor tests that were previously skipped due to not having sufficient hardware? They are now failing with
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 3293, in wrapper
method(*args, **kwargs)
File "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 3292, in wrapper
with policy():
File "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/testing/_internal/common_utils.py", line 2532, in __enter__
self.beforeStreams[-1].synchronize()
File "/opt/conda/envs/py_3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/cuda/streams.py", line 105, in synchronize
super().synchronize()
torch.AcceleratorError: CUDA error: device-side assert triggered
Search for `cudaErrorAssert' in https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-runtime-api/group__CUDART__TYPES.html for more information.
CUDA kernel errors might be asynchronously reported at some other API call, so the stacktrace below might be incorrect.
For debugging consider passing CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1
Compile with `TORCH_USE_CUDA_DSA` to enable device-side assertions.
Exception raised from stream_synchronize at /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/c10/cuda/CUDAFunctions.h:120 (most recent call first):
C++ CapturedTraceback:
#4 std::_Function_handler<std::shared_ptr<c10::LazyValue<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > const> (), c10::SetStackTraceFetcher(std::function<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > ()>)::{lambda()#1}>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) from Logging.cpp:0
#5 c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) from ??:0
#6 c10::cuda::c10_cuda_check_implementation(int, char const*, char const*, unsigned int, bool) [clone .cold] from CUDAException.cpp:0
pytorch#7 THCPStream_synchronize(_object*, _object*) from Stream.cpp:0
pytorch#8 cfunction_vectorcall_NOARGS from /usr/local/src/conda/python-3.10.14/Objects/methodobject.c:489
pytorch#9 _PyObject_VectorcallTstate from /usr/local/src/conda/python-3.10.14/Include/cpython/abstract.h:114
pytorch#10 _PyEval_EvalFrame from /usr/local/src/conda/python-3.10.14/Include/internal/pycore_ceval.h:46
pytorch#11 _PyObject_VectorcallTstate from /usr/local/src/conda/python-3.10.14/Include/cpython/abstract.h:114
pytorch#12 _PyEval_EvalFrame from /usr/local/src/conda/python-3.10.14/Include/internal/pycore_ceval.h:46
```
when run with cuda launch blocking I got a ton of stuff like
```
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [5,3,0], thread: [2,7,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [5,3,0], thread: [3,7,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [0,0,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [1,0,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [2,0,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [3,0,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [0,1,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [1,1,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [3,1,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [0,2,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [2,2,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [3,2,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [0,3,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [1,3,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [1,4,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/third_party/cutlass/include/cutlass/integer_subbyte.h:124: cutlass::integer_subbyte<Bits, Signed>::integer_subbyte(unsigned int) [with int Bits = 2; __nv_bool Signed = false]: block: [3,8,0], thread: [3,4,0] Assertion `value < upper_bound` failed.
```
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#165158
Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2026
If another static object (like `g_device_config_parse_hook_registry_instance` created by the `REGISTER_ALLOCATOR_CONFIG_PARSE_HOOK` macro) tries to call `registerDeviceConfigParserHook` before `device_config_parser_hook_` is initialized, assigning to it (operator=) can fail, which leads to a runtime error.
When I use a compilation optimization of ` -O1` I see this issue:
```
[src/libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:496]:14: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'const __policy'
#0 0x563224e28b78 in operator= [crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:496]:14
#1 0x563224e28b78 in operator= [crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:483]:19
#2 0x563224e28b78 in operator= [crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:727]:8
#3 0x563224e28b78 in c10::CachingAllocator::AcceleratorAllocatorConfig::registerDeviceConfigParserHook(std::__u::function<void (std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>> const&)>&&, std::__u::unordered_set<std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>, std::__u::hash<std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>>, std::__u::equal_to<std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>>, std::__u::allocator<std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>>> const&) [torch/c10/core/AllocatorConfig.h:263]:32
#4 0x563224e28e9d in DeviceConfigParserHookRegistry [torch/c10/core/AllocatorConfig.h:369]:5
#5 0x563224e28e9d in __cxx_global_var_init.34 [torch/c10/cuda/CUDAAllocatorConfig.cpp:195]:1
#6 0x563224e28e9d in _GLOBAL__sub_I_CUDAAllocatorConfig.cpp torch/c10/cuda/CUDAAllocatorConfig.cpp
pytorch#7 0x5632459709ac in __libc_csu_init /[usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/elf-init.c:88]:7
pytorch#8 0x7f748b9562e7 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x612e7) (BuildId: ca23ec6d935352118622ce674a8bb52d)
pytorch#9 0x5632018f3729 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120
```
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#172581
Approved by: https://github.com/guangyey, https://github.com/albanD
bohnstingl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2026
…nces between x86 vs aarch64 (pytorch#176085) In the test: ``` python test/cpp_extensions/test_libtorch_agnostic.py TestLibtorchAgnosticCUDA.test_std_cuda_check_error_show_cpp_stacktraces_True_cuda ``` it raises an exception when calling `STD_CUDA_CHECK(cudaSetDevice(99999));` which got the expected `CUDA error: invalid device` message. However, the expected string for the C++ stack trace is different between `x86` vs `aarch64` due perhaps in these issues: - pytorch#119905 - pytorch#134387 In the current setup when getting a stack trace string: - x86 contains `C++ CapturedTraceback:` - aarch64 contains `Exception raised from` + `frame #` An example of the full string from an aarch64 system when : ``` AssertionError: 'C++ CapturedTraceback:' not found in 'CUDA error: invalid device ordinal\nGPU device may be out of range, do you have enough GPUs?\nCUDA kernel errors might be asynchronously reported at some other API call, so the stacktrace below might be incorrect.\nFor debugging consider passing CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1\nCompile with `TORCH_USE_CUDA_DSA` to enable device-side assertions.\n\nException raised from test_std_cuda_check_error at /opt/pytorch/pytorch/test/cpp_extensions/libtorch_agn_2_10_extension/csrc/test_std_cuda_check.cu:23 (most recent call first):\nframe #0: c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) + 0xd4 (0xe471ebcd39f4 in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libc10.so)\nframe #1: <unknown function> + 0x43f998 (0xe471ebdcf998 in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libc10_cuda.so)\nframe #2: c10::cuda::c10_cuda_check_implementation(int, char const*, char const*, unsigned int, bool) + 0x1bc (0xe471ebdcfc0c in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libc10_cuda.so)\nframe #3: torch_c10_cuda_check_msg + 0x1c (0xe471ef335c4c in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libtorch_cuda.so)\nframe #4: test_std_cuda_check_error() + 0x58 (0xe470cd396678 in /opt/pytorch/pytorch/test/cpp_extensions/libtorch_agn_2_10_extension/install/usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/libtorch_agn_2_10/_C.so)\nframe #5: c10::BoxedKernel::makeFromFunctor<StableIValueBoxedKernel>(std::unique_ptr<StableIValueBoxedKernel, std::default_delete<StableIValueBoxedKernel> >)::{lambda(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::OperatorHandle const&, c10::DispatchKeySet, std::vector<c10::IValue, std::allocator<c10::IValue> >*)#1}::_FUN(c10::OperatorKernel*, c10::OperatorHandle const&, c10::DispatchKeySet, std::vector<c10::IValue, std::allocator<c10::IValue> >*) + 0x16c (0xe47211cd419c in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libtorch_cpu.so)\nframe #6: <unknown function> + 0x61d34bc (0xe47211cf34bc in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libtorch_cpu.so)\nframe pytorch#7: <unknown function> + 0xe6c324 (0xe4721532c324 in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so)\nframe pytorch#8: <unknown function> + 0xe6c7e0 (0xe4721532c7e0 in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so)\nframe pytorch#9: <unknown function> + 0xd3907c (0xe472151f907c in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so)\nframe pytorch#10: <unknown function> + 0x5ccbf8 (0xe47214a8cbf8 in /usr/local/lib/python3.12/dist-packages/torch/lib/libtorch_python.so)\nframe pytorch#11: /usr/bin/python() [0x504a34]\nframe pytorch#12: PyObject_Call + 0x6c (0x4c633c in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#13: _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault + 0x3ea0 (0x568564 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#14: _PyObject_Call_Prepend + 0xc4 (0x4c5934 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#15: /usr/bin/python() [0x52a070]\nframe pytorch#16: _PyObject_MakeTpCall + 0x78 (0x4c3e58 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#17: _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault + 0x8a0 (0x564f64 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#18: PyEval_EvalCode + 0x130 (0x5632b4 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#19: PyRun_StringFlags + 0xe0 (0x59c330 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#20: PyRun_SimpleStringFlags + 0x44 (0x67ebc4 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#21: Py_RunMain + 0x390 (0x68b380 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#22: Py_BytesMain + 0x28 (0x68ae88 in /usr/bin/python)\nframe pytorch#23: <unknown function> + 0x284c4 (0xe47216b084c4 in /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6)\nframe pytorch#24: __libc_start_main + 0x98 (0xe47216b08598 in /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6)\nframe pytorch#25: _start + 0x30 (0x5f6770 in /usr/bin/python)\n\n' To execute this test, run the following from the base repo dir: python test/cpp_extensions/test_libtorch_agnostic.py TestLibtorchAgnosticCUDA.test_std_cuda_check_error_show_cpp_stacktraces_True_cuda ``` Pull Request resolved: pytorch#176085 Approved by: https://github.com/eqy
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces the feature of partial gradient handling. This allows the scan to be used in cases where not all tensors of the init, the xs or the additional_inputs require gradients.
cc @ydwu4