Prove generic accepted work packages with rich artifacts - #18
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Acceptance evidence
Fresh Cursor runs reached approved-package and approved-plan in separate worktrees and fresh controller state. Both runs rejected malformed task, verifier, command, journey, and schema candidates before accepting the valid package. Exact package verification passed individually and together with approval and current-program requirements. Generic manifests and approvals contain no plan fields; only the promotion receipt names implementation-plan, while architecture-plan remains an ordinary output.
Local verification
No product implementation, merge, or deployment was performed.