Skip to content

ci: the Redline review and fix workflows now come from askalf/ci - #132

Merged
askalf merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/redline-pin-askalf-ci-48dcf94
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

askalf merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/redline-pin-askalf-ci-48dcf94

Conversation

@askalf

@askalf askalf commented Sep 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The shared Redline workflows moved from the profile repo to askalf/ci, and their prompts now live on the runner host instead of in a public repository. This pins the caller(s) here ( redline.yml ) to askalf/ci at 48dcf94; the uses: sha and redline-ref stay identical. Nothing else changes.

@askalf
askalf enabled auto-merge (squash) September 27, 2026 03:33
@github-actions github-actions Bot added github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code size/XS Under 10 hand-written lines labels Sep 27, 2026

@sprayberry-redline sprayberry-redline left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verdict: approve. Repoints the reusable Redline review workflow from askalf/askalf to askalf/ci, pinned to a full commit SHA that matches the redline-ref input. The read-only permissions, same-repo and non-draft gate, and concurrency group are unchanged, so the security posture of the caller is the same as before. One note outside the changed lines: the header comment at the top of the file still names askalf/askalf as the home of the review workflow and could be updated to askalf/ci in a follow-up.

@askalf
askalf merged commit 0903631 into master Sep 27, 2026
14 checks passed
@askalf
askalf deleted the ci/redline-pin-askalf-ci-48dcf94 branch September 27, 2026 03:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code size/XS Under 10 hand-written lines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants