Break it
The semantic supply-chain preview now includes Meaning Fingerprints, project Meaning Manifests, Ed25519 manifest attestations, append-only Semantic Lineage, signed Semantic Release Proofs, and a CI Semantic Release Gate.
We want adversarial review from outside the canonical implementation.
High-value attacks
Try to make a verifier return success after any of the following:
- change compiled meaning without changing the accepted Meaning Fingerprint;
- exploit canonicalization ambiguity;
- add/remove/rename a manifest path without invalidating the project root;
- relabel signer identity or signing time without invalidating attribution;
- splice, reorder, truncate, or rewrite Semantic Lineage;
- swap before/after manifests or attestations;
- alter changed-source evidence while preserving release-proof acceptance;
- forge change counts or detailed semantic diff output;
- exploit malformed JSON/key/signature structures to produce fail-open behavior;
- exploit version/protocol confusion;
- make the GitHub Action expose unverified metadata as authenticated output.
Reporting
Please include a minimal reproducer and exact commit/tag tested. Public issues are welcome for non-sensitive findings. For vulnerabilities that should not be disclosed publicly before a fix, follow SECURITY.md.
A valid finding is valuable even if it disproves a project assumption. Confirmed failures should become regression tests and public fixes.
Boundary
This is an invitation to test software claims, not a bug bounty promise or certification program. No reward is implied. External findings do not imply endorsement or partnership.
Created by Daniel Jacob Read IV. Steward: ĀRU Intelligence Inc.™.
Break it
The semantic supply-chain preview now includes Meaning Fingerprints, project Meaning Manifests, Ed25519 manifest attestations, append-only Semantic Lineage, signed Semantic Release Proofs, and a CI Semantic Release Gate.
We want adversarial review from outside the canonical implementation.
High-value attacks
Try to make a verifier return success after any of the following:
Reporting
Please include a minimal reproducer and exact commit/tag tested. Public issues are welcome for non-sensitive findings. For vulnerabilities that should not be disclosed publicly before a fix, follow
SECURITY.md.A valid finding is valuable even if it disproves a project assumption. Confirmed failures should become regression tests and public fixes.
Boundary
This is an invitation to test software claims, not a bug bounty promise or certification program. No reward is implied. External findings do not imply endorsement or partnership.
Created by Daniel Jacob Read IV. Steward: ĀRU Intelligence Inc.™.