feat: type WAF rule tools with appwrite-console 0.10

[ChiragAgg5k]

Bumps appwrite-console from >=0.8.1,<0.9 to >=0.10.0,<0.11, so the WAF tools match the API:

• waf_create_*_rule and waf_update_*_rule take conditions as an array of strings. With 0.8.1 the tool schema said a single string, and the API rejected it.
• waf_get_rule returns the model for the rule's action, keeping fields like difficulty, ttl and location that the generic WafRule dropped.

0.9.0 also changed the analytics property tools (no timezone) and OAuth2 resource (now a list of URIs). The API-key catalog keeps the same 27 services and 676 tools.

test_waf_rule_tools_take_conditions_as_a_list_of_strings fails on 0.8.1 and passes on 0.10.0.

[hansi-codes]

🔵 Tier A · Mergeable after minor fixes

The change is otherwise narrowly scoped, with one minor test-coverage gap for the claimed WAF response-model behavior.

The project now requires appwrite-console 0.10.x, and the unit suite checks that WAF create/update tools expose conditions as arrays of strings. The lockfile resolves the new dependency to 0.10.0.

Verdict	New comments	Fixed	Still open
✅ Approved	1	0	0

	Finding	Where
🟡	Cover the action-specific WAF get response	tests/unit/test_server.py:1031

Fix with agent prompt

### Issue 1
tests/unit/test_server.py:1031-1033
**Cover the action-specific WAF get response**

The dependency bump is also meant to make `waf_get_rule` preserve action-specific fields such as `difficulty`, `ttl`, and `location`, but this new test only checks create/update input schemas. A regression to the generic `WafRule` response would still pass; please add a model or fixture assertion for the richer get response.

---

For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.

📂 Walkthrough · 3

File	Change
pyproject.toml	Raises the appwrite-console dependency range to 0.10.x.
uv.lock	Resolves appwrite-console to 0.10.0 and updates the lock metadata.
tests/unit/test_server.py	Adds schema assertions for WAF create/update condition lists.

---

_{Reviewed 0f51024 · Details · Comment @hansi-codes review to re-run, or mention @hansi-codes with a question.}

[hansi-codes]

🔵 Tier A · Looks good to merge. Summary

[hansi-codes]

Cover the action-specific WAF get response

The dependency bump is also meant to make waf_get_rule preserve action-specific fields such as difficulty, ttl, and location, but this new test only checks create/update input schemas. A regression to the generic WafRule response would still pass; please add a model or fixture assertion for the richer get response.

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: tests/unit/test_server.py
Line: 1031-1033

Comment:
**Cover the action-specific WAF get response**

The dependency bump is also meant to make `waf_get_rule` preserve action-specific fields such as `difficulty`, `ttl`, and `location`, but this new test only checks create/update input schemas. A regression to the generic `WafRule` response would still pass; please add a model or fixture assertion for the richer get response.

---

For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.

_{🟡 Minor · testing · Reply if this doesn't apply.}