-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
fix(common): publish queue configuration safely #7141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Aias00
merged 4 commits into
apache:master
from
dengliming:fix-6774-memory-safe-queue-visibility
Sep 21, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
661c6c1
fix(common): publish queue configuration safely
dengliming 1ba576a
Merge branch 'master' into fix-6774-memory-safe-queue-visibility
Aias00 72648aa
Merge branch 'master' into fix-6774-memory-safe-queue-visibility
Aias00 2bdbb4f
Merge branch 'master' into fix-6774-memory-safe-queue-visibility
Aias00 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
volatileis the right fix and it is genuinely needed here - unlike a plain immutable field, both values have public setters (setMaxFreeMemory/setRejector), so they really are mutable shared state read fromput/offeron arbitrary threads.Two notes, neither blocking:
hasRemainedMemory()is still check-then-act:volatilegives visibility formaxFreeMemory/rejector, it does not make the memory check atomic with the enqueue. That is fine for a best-effort OOM guard - arguably publishing the config safely is exactly what was missing - but worth a comment so nobody readsvolatileas "the guard is atomic".Modifier.isVolatile(...)by reflection checks an implementation detail, and would silently pass even if the setter were removed and the field became effectively final. A behavioural test (e.g.setMaxFreeMemory(0)from one thread while another offers) is more valuable, though harder to make deterministic - so keeping this as a cheap regression guard is acceptable.