Repository navigation
HDDS-16657. Reject lifecycle Transition actions in PutBucketLifecycleConfiguration - #11430
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rich7420
reviewed
Oct 7, 2026
| @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) | ||
| @XmlRootElement(name = "Transition") | ||
| public static class Transition { | ||
| @XmlElement(name = "Days") |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: Could we omit Days and Date and their accessors? Transition actions are always rejected, so only StorageClass is needed for the error message.
Contributor
|
Merged. Thanks @priyeshkaratha for working on this, @rich7420 for the review. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, PutBucketLifecycleConfiguration does not support the Transition field. If a request includes a Transition rule, the API silently ignores it and returns a 200 success response.
This change updates the behavior to reject requests that include a Transition rule, rather than silently dropping the unsupported field and returning a successful response.
What is the link to the Apache JIRA
HDDS-16657
How was this patch tested?
Tested using newly added testcase.