OAK-12229 Rethrow IOException in JournalReader#computeNext#2921
Open
jelmini wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Currently, an IOException while reading the journal is swallowed and is interpreted as no/empty journal, which can lead to data loss. This behavior was contradicted by JournalReader#computeNext own Javadoc.
Member
thomasmueller
left a comment
thomasmueller
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add a feature toggle (possibly combined with a system property)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rethrow IOException in JournalReader#computeNext instead of silently swallowing it.
Currently, an IOException while reading the journal is swallowed and is
interpreted as no/empty journal, which can lead to data loss. This
behavior was contradicted by JournalReader#computeNext own Javadoc.