Repository navigation
Fixes some bugs with GroupIntoBatches. #40754
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
acrites
wants to merge
9
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
acrites:group-into-batches-fix
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cb5d427
Fix GroupIntoBatches watermark hold update, timerTs state, early flus…
acrites b2bcbd7
Allow non-positive batchSize in GroupIntoBatches to maintain backward…
acrites 3f026b8
Revert prefetchFrequency change for batchSize == Long.MAX_VALUE
acrites 6e008e5
Revert onHoldTimer callback to original no-op implementation
acrites 0fd6398
Update testOutOfOrderTimestampsInBatch to ofSize(3) to test watermark…
acrites bab7761
Revert changes unrelated to watermark hold for out of order elements
acrites f6660d9
Revert timerTs persistence changes
acrites dd1527b
Reuse currentMinBufferedTs to avoid multiple minBufferedTs.read() calls
acrites ca981ea
Strengthen testOutOfOrderTimestampsInBatch to verify watermark hold p…
acrites File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: i like
currentMinBufferedTs != oldOutputTs, set a timer when MinBufferedTs is modified is easier to read than whencurrentMinBufferedTs < oldOutputTs. they both are true when we need a new timer.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we had a bug where somehow
currentMinBufferedTs > oldOutputTsby accident, maybe it is better to have the bound instead of depending on<being equivalent to!=due to context?