You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sounds good. As discussed in the PR, let's wait for the source implementation with SDF support (#38706) to go in first and then you can add perf testing on top of that.
Activity
durgaprasadml commentedon May 30, 2026
Hi @chamikaramj, I would like to work on this issue.
I’ve been analyzing the Delta Lake source implementation and the existing Beam IO integration/performance test patterns. My plan is to:
I’ll follow the existing Beam IO connector architecture and keep the implementation modular and contribution-ready.
chamikaramj commentedon May 30, 2026
Sounds good. As discussed in the PR, let's wait for the source implementation with SDF support (#38706) to go in first and then you can add perf testing on top of that.
chamikaramj commentedon May 30, 2026
For perf testing, let's make sure that that we deploy a real Delta Lake instance with a large input size (for example, 100 GB).
We should also use a distributed Beam runner instead of a local runner so that the work get parallelized.
Results can be published to here: https://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/1/getting-started?orgId=1&viewPanel=123125
Documentation on testing: https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/testing/
durgaprasadml commentedon May 30, 2026
I’ll wait for the SDF-based source implementation in #38706 to land first and then continue the perf-testing work on top of that implementation.