Skip to content

Take the widened prose check from the source repository - #62

Merged
oblomov-dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/repos-improvement-analysis-thhnn2
Aug 28, 2026
Merged

Take the widened prose check from the source repository#62
oblomov-dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/repos-improvement-analysis-thhnn2

Conversation

@oblomov-dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this changes

scripts/check-prose-names.mjs is a byte-equal copy of abap2UI5's
.github/shared/check-prose-names.mjs. That file gained two fixes in
abap2UI5#2674, so abap2UI5's own npm run check:shared is red until every
consumer carries the same bytes. This takes them.

The two changes, both made at the source:

  • docs/ is now walked recursively. The prose set never included anything
    under docs/, so pages that cite class and control names constantly were
    outside the gate entirely.
  • The dead STATUS-history.md exclusion is replaced by one matching
    docs/history.md. The old pattern named a file that no longer exists, so it
    excluded nothing; the replacement keeps journals out on purpose, because a
    journal records what a class was called when the entry was written, not what
    it is called now.

Verification

Run here before taking it: node scripts/check-prose-names.mjs reports
14 class names across 4 prose files, all of them real — no new findings,
nothing to allowlist.

This is the last of the three consumer copies; with abap2UI5/samples#806 and
abap2UI5/samples-controls#159 it closes the check:shared window that has been
red on abap2UI5 main since #2674 merged.


Generated by Claude Code

abap2UI5 owns .github/shared/check-prose-names.mjs and this is a byte-equal
copy, held so by that repository's check:shared - which is red until every
consumer carries the same bytes.

Two changes, both made there: docs/ is now walked recursively, and the dead
STATUS-history.md exclusion is replaced by one matching docs/history.md, since
a journal records what a class was called when the entry was written.

Widening it to docs/ produces no new findings here - checked before taking it.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 28, 2026 13:16

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@oblomov-dev
oblomov-dev merged commit 3f86c6d into main Aug 28, 2026
2 checks passed
@oblomov-dev
oblomov-dev deleted the claude/repos-improvement-analysis-thhnn2 branch August 28, 2026 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants