Skip to content

Research: compare eight AI-generated AGI architecture proposals - #53

Open
Nish916 wants to merge 1 commit into
aLexzzz430:mainfrom
Nish916:bounty/ai-agi-architecture-research
Open

Nish916 wants to merge 1 commit into
aLexzzz430:mainfrom
Nish916:bounty/ai-agi-architecture-research

Conversation

@Nish916

@Nish916 Nish916 commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Purpose

Implements issue #5 with an auditable research packet comparing eight independently generated, implementation-oriented cognitive architecture proposals.

What is included

  • 8 usable system/model outputs: Qwen3 8B, Llama 3.1 8B, Gemma 3 4B, Qwen2.5 Coder 7B, Mistral 7B, Phi-4 Mini, Granite 3.3 2B, and GPT-5.6 Sol
  • transparent record of a DeepSeek-R1 collection attempt that produced no usable final answer and is not counted
  • exact shared prompt and collection notes
  • raw outputs preserved separately from analysis
  • structured comparison across all 11 required architecture dimensions
  • common-pattern/disagreement summary
  • implementation-oriented synthesis
  • model/provider/date/edit provenance

Validation

  • python scripts/check_conos_repo_layout.py ✅
  • pytest -q tests/test_public_repo_smoke.py → 10 passed ✅
  • required-file check ✅
  • 8 comparison rows × 11 requested dimensions ✅
  • local secret-pattern scan: no hits ✅

Public surface / dependencies

  • Public surface change: research documentation only
  • New adapter dependency: none
  • Runtime behavior change: none

The packet deliberately separates generated outputs from analysis and does not substitute fabricated output for a model that failed to produce a final answer.

Nish916 commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ready for maintainer review. The submission maps the issue requirements to the research packet, preserves eight usable raw model/system outputs separately from analysis, includes the 11-dimension comparison and implementation-oriented synthesis, and passes the repository layout check plus 10/10 public smoke tests. If any acceptance criterion needs adjustment or additional provenance, I can address targeted review feedback directly in this PR.

Nish916 commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

CI appears to be waiting on repository approval rather than failing the submission: the pull-request workflow run is currently action_required, while GitHub reports this PR as mergeable with no merge conflict. When convenient, please approve/run the CI workflow for this fork PR so the repository checks can execute. The repository-boundary check and git diff --check pass locally.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant