Skip to content

Restate problems before accepting proposed solutions - #452

Merged
Wibias merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
improve/problem-restatement-gate
Sep 12, 2026
Merged

Wibias merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
improve/problem-restatement-gate

Conversation

@Wibias

@Wibias Wibias commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • ground PRDs in verified current behavior and user intent before accepting an implementation proposal
  • keep proposed implementations as hypotheses unless repository evidence supports them or the user explicitly requires the implementation
  • apply the same separation to refactor planning before minimal-solution selection
  • surface mismatches between the requested outcome and the proposed implementation without overriding explicit user authority

Scope

Primary behavior change remains limited to references/issue-workflows.md.
Qualification metadata also updates SKILL.md and tests/evals/cases.jsonl.

Qualification preparation

  • preserved the existing mature regression corpus and regression-lock.json unchanged
  • added E2 for PRD problem restatement: verified current behavior, desired outcome, proposed implementation as hypothesis, and explicit-user constraints
  • added E3 for refactor planning: verify current shape, restate the structural problem, keep proposed architecture separate, then apply minimal-solution selection
  • added the existing eval resources to SKILL.md's eval:references block
  • aligned canonical A4 with the bounded-review contract: denied required local writes are surfaced and cannot become fake downstream GitHub success
  • added concise failure-reporting semantics for missing targets/resources, failed required helpers, and denied writes
  • left A5 intact because the canonical .agents install contains the real babysit redirect owner for the required competing-skill comparison
  • no new passing regression is fabricated before the bounded review
  • qualification uses the bounded strong/weaker Skill Ratchet review rather than replaying the eval suite case-by-case

Verification state

The earlier head had green CI/Dependency Review/Windows trace checks, but qualification metadata and contract hardening moved the head. Fresh repository checks plus Skill Ratchet structural/complete validation are required on the current revision.

PR remains Draft until the strong and weaker bounded reviews pass on the same current revision and the final review-evidence validator exits zero.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 6930b773-a657-4f46-8b0b-b93d281448cd


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Wibias
Wibias marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2026 02:22
@Wibias
Wibias merged commit 33713f1 into main Sep 12, 2026
12 checks passed
@Wibias
Wibias deleted the improve/problem-restatement-gate branch September 12, 2026 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant