docs: refresh README and testing guidance

[ryanbarlow97]

Move detailed installation-trade mechanics into Docs and keep the README focused on current features and tests.

Follows the README layout and documentation ownership rules in TF-Minecraft/Docs. Related guide updates: TF-Minecraft/Docs#110.

Validation: git diff --check; README links, source paths and anchors checked against the task worktrees. Feature and test claims checked against current source and build configuration. Plugin/runtime suites were not rerun for these documentation edits.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 224f22e6-f3a0-4a91-a5fb-4ea9587af027

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c9991d and f98400d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the Features section to describe military infrastructure and its role in guild trade and production.
  • Removed the installation trade section and the /faction construct command syntax.
  • Clarified that branch coverage is reported separately, while retaining the 100% production line coverage requirement.

Walkthrough

The README revises the Military infrastructure description, removes the Installation trade section, and updates its tests and coverage wording.

Changes

README updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Feature descriptions README.md	The Military infrastructure description now says transport networks extend guild trade and production. The Installation trade section and its rules and configuration details are removed.
Tests and coverage wording README.md	The heading changes to “Tests and coverage”. The coverage description says branch coverage is reported separately and retains the 100% production line coverage requirement and CI report uploads.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~4 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: drefvelin

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to f9840

The README refresh moves installation details to project documentation and updates test and coverage wording. No concrete user or workflow regression is identified, so the change appears mergeable after normal checks.

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}