Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Ky Nash

Structural analysis · Runtime governance · Reproducible testing

I develop Sigilith, a research framework for analysing the structure of symbolic systems, and ThreeLineage, a project exploring governed execution and auditable runtime behaviour.

My focus is on making technical claims inspectable: clear assumptions, bounded experiments, explicit failure cases, and evidence tied to the code that produced it.

Open to scoped, remote work: Python tooling, regression tests, technical documentation, and research reproducibility.

Discuss a project · Read the primary paper


Start with the research

Sigilith studies structural properties of symbolic systems through canonical segmentation, behaviour-preserving transformations, metric extraction, structural signature constraints, and classification.

The research concerns structure. Structural similarity alone does not establish a text's meaning, language, or decipherment.

Primary paper
Nash, K. (2026). A reproducible structural analysis of the Voynich manuscript via Sigilith v1.0.
DOI and publication record · PDF in this repository · Citation metadata

This repository is a research entry point containing the paper and citation metadata. It does not currently include an executable reproduction package.

Runtime governance work

ThreeLineage / TraceGuard is my development work on execution boundaries, authenticated requests, audit records, and recovery behaviour.

The questions guiding that work are concrete:

  • What is authorised to execute, and what happens when authorisation fails?
  • Can an audit record be checked for alteration or missing links?
  • What happens when a key is revoked, a request is replayed, or a process restarts?
  • Which guarantees depend on the operating environment?

Runtime results need their own source, test commands, commit identifiers, and stated limitations. The research paper above is not a security certification of the runtime.

How I approach contributions

  1. Agree the problem and acceptance criteria.
  2. Reproduce the failure or establish the baseline.
  3. Make a focused change with a regression test.
  4. Record the exact commit, commands, results, and remaining limitations.

Verification should be repeatable by a reviewer. A project name or generated comment is not test evidence.

Research catalogue

The following DOI links are retained from the original research index.

Collection Publication records
Core framework Record 1 · Record 2
Case studies Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
Further case studies Record 4 · Record 5 · Record 6

Work with me

For a remote project, send the problem, repository or sample input, expected deliverable, budget, and deadline to kynash1@outlook.com.

K. Nash
ThreeLineage

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors