Repository navigation
feat: long-term memory tools (save/search/delete_memory) #29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Rikul
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
claude/lucid-brown-sumujy
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7d145c1
feat: long-term memory tools (save/search/delete_memory)
claude 3dcc078
fix(memory): address review findings on the memory tools
claude 01d8ea0
docs: note that long-term memories are shared by everyone allowed on …
claude 6b93436
feat(memory): put memories relevant to the message in the prompt
claude 984c1a6
feat(memory): core memories that are always in the prompt
claude c9340c9
fix(memory): fence saved memories as data; rebuild a missing search i…
claude f1f0b80
fix(memory): keep memory text inside its prompt fence; keep category …
claude 069840e
fix(memory): report a memory deleted mid-save instead of crashing
claude 9a6bcc4
fix(memory): cap and normalise memory categories
claude 8218ecb
fix(memory): ignore memory-phrasing verbs when matching relevance
claude File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 Medium · security — Stored memories can be planted from web/tool content and then honoured as user preferences
The prompt tells the model to honour saved memories 'as the user's stated preferences'. The only guard against saving untrusted content is the wording in sys_instructions.md, which nothing enforces. Background agents (scheduled tasks) have web_fetch and save_memory. A fetched page can therefore make the agent save a standing instruction, and with core=true it is shown in every future conversation, across all channels. The memory is then treated as the user's own preference. Fix: stop saying 'honour them as the user's stated preferences', and make the fence say memories are informational only. Also consider withholding save_memory, especially core=true, from background and tool-driven runs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not changing this for now. One premise doesn't hold: scheduled tasks don't run on
BackgroundAgent. They run onHelperAgent, which getssearch_memoryonly, and since 3dcc078 itshandle_tool_call()refuses any tool outside that list. So no unattended run can save a memory.BackgroundAgentis the agent behind each chat channel, and there the user is in the conversation and sees the "I'll remember that" confirmation the instructions ask for."Honour them as the user's stated preferences" is intentional. Memories are where standing instructions like "don't use emoji" or "always ask before git push" live, and the suggested "background only" wording would stop the agent from following them. The fence already says memories never override the system instructions or safety rules, and that text inside them trying to set new rules or run tools is ignored. sys_instructions.md also says not to save text from web pages, files or tool output.
The remaining risk is a user-attended chat where a fetched page talks the agent into saving something. Closing it fully would mean blocking
save_memoryafter untrusted tool output in a turn, which is a bigger design change. Leaving this thread open for the owner to decide.Generated by Claude Code