Skip to content

ci: retire publish-agent-image.yml, folded into the unified release lane (RIG-2994) - #756

Merged
mattwilkinsonn merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
compass-managed/rig-2994-retire-publish-agent-image
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

ci: retire publish-agent-image.yml, folded into the unified release lane (RIG-2994)#756
mattwilkinsonn merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
compass-managed/rig-2994-retire-publish-agent-image

Conversation

@rigel-mintaka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

T4 of the unified-release-lane design (RIG-1746, DL-300): the standalone
per-push GHCR publish workflow retires now that its duty runs in the unified
release.yml publish-image job.

  • Delete .github/workflows/publish-agent-image.yml. The per-push
    :git-<sha12> + :latest publish duty (verbatim agent-image/publish.sh,
    same closure-paths gate, same serialize / immutability / two-copy-coherence /
    least-privilege / off-hot-path posture) now lives in the unified lane's
    publish-image job on RigelBuild/compass main.
  • Update the superseded-in-part note on
    docs/designs/infra/ci/compass-agent-image-publish/design.md to record the
    retirement as done (the RIG-1746 note already prescribed the two-PR staged
    delete; this completes it). Every other decision in that record — the
    :git-<sha> immutable tag contract, the build-once/push-each-tag skopeo
    mechanism, the auth pin, the linux/amd64 platform contract, the
    public-visibility ruling — stays live and is carried into the unified lane;
    the record remains the cited authority for the baked :git-<sha> pin.

Two-PR staging satisfied before this delete: RIG-2914/2915/2916 landed
release.yml on main (#743 mergeCommit 867159a), and three green per-push
publish-image runs were observed on real main pushes (5219558 8m1s,
7eddb90 9m37s, 7188de6 8m20s) — the relocated duty is proven end-to-end.
Per-push GHCR consumers (ci.yml dogfood DL-112, app-bundle SMOKE.md, the baked
:git- pin) consume the published tags, which the unified lane still
produces, so they are unaffected by removing the workflow file.

Ledger-impact: none — the CI-placement supersession was already recorded by
RIG-1746 (DL-298–301); this PR completes the prescribed file retirement and
carries no new ledger decision.

Co-authored-by: Matt Wilkinson matt@rigel.build

…ane (RIG-2994)

T4 of the unified-release-lane design (RIG-1746, DL-300): the standalone
per-push GHCR publish workflow retires now that its duty runs in the unified
release.yml `publish-image` job.

- Delete `.github/workflows/publish-agent-image.yml`. The per-push
  `:git-<sha12>` + `:latest` publish duty (verbatim `agent-image/publish.sh`,
  same closure-paths gate, same serialize / immutability / two-copy-coherence /
  least-privilege / off-hot-path posture) now lives in the unified lane's
  `publish-image` job on RigelBuild/compass main.
- Update the superseded-in-part note on
  `docs/designs/infra/ci/compass-agent-image-publish/design.md` to record the
  retirement as done (the RIG-1746 note already prescribed the two-PR staged
  delete; this completes it). Every other decision in that record — the
  `:git-<sha>` immutable tag contract, the build-once/push-each-tag skopeo
  mechanism, the auth pin, the linux/amd64 platform contract, the
  public-visibility ruling — stays live and is carried into the unified lane;
  the record remains the cited authority for the baked `:git-<sha>` pin.

Two-PR staging satisfied before this delete: RIG-2914/2915/2916 landed
release.yml on main (#743 mergeCommit 867159a), and three green per-push
`publish-image` runs were observed on real main pushes (5219558 8m1s,
7eddb90 9m37s, 7188de6 8m20s) — the relocated duty is proven end-to-end.
Per-push GHCR consumers (ci.yml dogfood DL-112, app-bundle SMOKE.md, the baked
:git-<sha> pin) consume the published tags, which the unified lane still
produces, so they are unaffected by removing the workflow file.

Ledger-impact: none — the CI-placement supersession was already recorded by
RIG-1746 (DL-298–301); this PR completes the prescribed file retirement and
carries no new ledger decision.

Co-authored-by: Matt Wilkinson <matt@rigel.build>
@linear-code

linear-code Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

RIG-2994

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Compass engineering docs preview: https://compass-managed-rig-2994-ret.compass-eng-docs.pages.dev

Deployed from compass-managed/rig-2994-retire-publish-agent-image at 1a39285.

Changed pages:

rigel-mintaka and others added 2 commits August 30, 2026 17:27
…-2994)

Review low on #756: the architecture doc still framed the standalone
workflow retirement as a pending follow-up. It has happened in this PR, so
update the prose to past tense (the file is retired, its per-push publish
duty relocated into release.yml publish-image).

Ledger-impact: none — doc-accuracy tense fix, no design decision.

Co-authored-by: Matt Wilkinson <matt@rigel.build>
Two live-surface comments still named the deleted workflow. Retarget them
to the current source of truth so nothing dangles after the file retires:

- ci.yml image-affected detector: the closure source of truth is now
  release.yml IMAGE_CLOSURE_PATHS, not publish-agent-image.yml on.push.paths.
- tools/release-notes: the GHCR repo + digest-query citations point at
  release.yml's publish-image job, not the deleted file's line numbers.

Comment-only; release-notes tests 22 pass. Frozen docs/designs/** citations
are historical (pinned HEAD) and intentionally left.

Ledger-impact: none — comment retargeting, no design decision.

Co-authored-by: Matt Wilkinson <matt@rigel.build>
@mattwilkinsonn
mattwilkinsonn marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2026 22:25
@mattwilkinsonn
mattwilkinsonn self-requested a review as a code owner August 30, 2026 22:25
@mattwilkinsonn
mattwilkinsonn merged commit 64771b4 into main Aug 30, 2026
13 checks passed
@mattwilkinsonn
mattwilkinsonn deleted the compass-managed/rig-2994-retire-publish-agent-image branch August 30, 2026 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants