Skip to content

chore: add AI contribution policy#92

Merged
dustinbyrne merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/add-ai-policy-agent-context-20260615
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

chore: add AI contribution policy#92
dustinbyrne merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/add-ai-policy-agent-context-20260615

Conversation

@dustinbyrne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Problem

PostHog's main repo has an AI contributions policy and PR-template agent context section. The SDK and agent-extension repos should set the same expectations so AI-assisted contributions are easier to review consistently.

Changes

  • Add AI_POLICY.md at the repository root.
  • Add an Agent context section to the PR template.
  • Adapt the proof-of-work guidance for SDK and agent-extension projects by using repo-neutral testing guidance and calling out example-project smoke tests where applicable.

How did you test this code?

  • Verified the markdown changes locally.
  • Ran git diff --check.
  • Verified the PR template contains exactly one ## 🤖 Agent context section.

Checklist

  • Accounted for backwards compatibility of any changes (no breaking changes!)
  • Documentation-only change

🤖 Agent context

Autonomy: Human-driven (agent-assisted)

Pi was used to apply the same policy/template update across the SDK and agent-extension repositories. The change was prepared in isolated git worktrees to avoid disturbing existing local branches, then reviewed for duplicate Agent context sections and markdown whitespace issues.

@dustinbyrne dustinbyrne requested a review from a team as a code owner June 15, 2026 20:59
@dustinbyrne dustinbyrne self-assigned this Jun 15, 2026
@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "chore: add AI contribution policy" | Re-trigger Greptile

@dustinbyrne dustinbyrne merged commit 5b8867d into main Jun 15, 2026
15 checks passed
@dustinbyrne dustinbyrne deleted the chore/add-ai-policy-agent-context-20260615 branch June 15, 2026 22:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants