Skip to content

docs(fold): v0.34.4's record reads done on all three hosts; ADR 0045's knob line names the MLX hosts - #405

Merged
glennneuber merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/fold-0344-followups
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

glennneuber merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/fold-0344-followups

Conversation

@glennneuber

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This fixes three of the five follow-ups from #402's re-review (comment): items 1, 4 and 5, the ones in text the CUDA host keeps. Docs only, two files.

  • The fold record's preamble.
    • It said "In progress on the CUDA host — please do not start a parallel 0.34.4 fold", under "Status (2026-09-25)".
    • It now says the fold was merged in fold: upstream v0.34.4 — llama.cpp b11081, MLX 59d600b5, XGrammar 0.2.7 #375, tagged, and deployed on all three hosts on 2026-09-28.
    • The heading now reads "Status (2026-09-28, deployed on all three hosts)", as 0.34.2's record does. Nothing in the repo links to the old heading's anchor.
  • Status rows 5 and 6 get the sentence break they were missing before the Metal text.
  • Open item 5 still read gfx1151's gate 6 think-on as work "into 2026-09-26". The record's gfx1151 gate 6 section says it finished on 2026-09-27, on all five GGUF models. The item now says gates 4–6 are done on gfx1151 and on Metal.
  • ADR 0045 said the knob stays at 0 "on every host". gfx1151 serves no MLX, so the line now names the two hosts that do: CUDA and Metal.

Items 2 and 3, the golden models and the ./mlx/... tests, belong to the Metal host and are in #404.

Merge order with #404. #404 changes status row 4, and this PR changes rows 5 and 6, the next two lines. A trial merge (git merge-tree) reports a conflict in the fold record, which git reports whichever PR merges second. To resolve it, keep both sides. If #404 merges first, I'll rebase this PR.

Checks:

  • check_source_paths.py --changed-since origin/main is clean.
  • The name scan is clean.
  • The in-page anchor #gates-46-on-gfx1151-2026-09-25 resolves; row 6 already uses it.

ai-server/mlx-cuda

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…s knob line names the MLX hosts

The follow-ups from #402's re-review that sit in text the CUDA host keeps:
- The fold record's preamble said "In progress on the CUDA host", under a 2026-09-25 status heading. It now says
  the fold is merged, tagged and deployed on all three hosts, and the heading carries the date and the state, as
  0.34.2's record does.
- Status rows 5 and 6 ran into the Metal text without a sentence break.
- Open item 5 still read gfx1151's gate 6 as work "into 2026-09-26". It finished on 2026-09-27 on all five GGUF
  models, so the item says gates 4-6 are done on gfx1151 and on Metal.
- ADR 0045 said the knob stays at 0 "on every host". gfx1151 serves no MLX, so the line names the two hosts that do.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@glennneuber
glennneuber merged commit d1bf4a6 into main Sep 28, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant