Skip to content

docs(nuclear-option): record live-server findings for spec 002 - #50

Merged
ValgulNecron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/002-live-server-findings
Oct 11, 2026
Merged

ValgulNecron merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/002-live-server-findings

Conversation

@ValgulNecron

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Records the live-server findings for spec 002 (Nuclear Option) in nuclear-option/specs.md and README.md, observed on a real server on kubelab on 2026-10-11:

  • Logs: stdout only; no log files on /data (T021).
  • Ban list: resolves to /data/ban_list.txt, but the server never creates it, so bans on a fresh server are not persisted (T129).
  • Backup/restore round-trip with the stock Backup/Restore CRs: config and ban list restored with identical checksums (T129).
  • Config validation matrix: all invalid inputs rejected by the operator in under 1 s with a field-specific message, no pod created (T128).
  • Probe defect: the game image has no nc, so the exec probes always fail and the pod never becomes Ready.

Items that need a connected player (per-entry get-player-list, chat effect, Steam display-name hydration with and without the API key Secret) are kept UNVERIFIED with the reason stated. No code or template changes.

Test plan

  • Docs only; CI green

Log location (stdout only), ban_list.txt path and creation behaviour,
backup/restore round-trip, config validation matrix, and the probe
defect (image has no nc). Player-dependent items stay UNVERIFIED.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: valgulnecron <39313199+ValgulNecron@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 42eb9c02-3f36-4077-bc71-f96790532726

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ValgulNecron
ValgulNecron merged commit 91b64cc into main Oct 11, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant