Skip to content

consider standard protocol specification like AsyncAPI #6

Description

@crotwell

Perhaps worth considering something like
https://www.asyncapi.com/docs
for standard way to specify the protocol.

I'm not sure if this is actually worth it, but probably should at least look into it as following a standard may be useful in generating api documentation, automated testing and interaction with tools, etc.

Activity

andres-h commented on Jul 18, 2023

@andres-h
Collaborator

Feedback from proposal team

This may be a good idea, but we wouldn’t want to hold up the specification. It can be added later.

added
laterkeep issue for possible future version of protocol
on Oct 23, 2023

crotwell commented on Oct 23, 2023

@crotwell
CollaboratorAuthor

Agree, propose we leave this issue open for future consideration, but not be part of v4 spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    laterkeep issue for possible future version of protocol

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions