Skip to content

Update APM SDK benchmarks reference - #13146

Open
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/update-apm-sdks-benchmarks-reference-20261101
Open

dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/update-apm-sdks-benchmarks-reference-20261101

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

This PR updates the pinned apm-sdks-benchmarks GitLab CI includes and runtime clones to
DataDog/apm-sdks-benchmarks@27bc9ec5776ab69c48397c0e211dedbc05da704c.

Motivation

Keep Java SDK benchmarks current while retaining reproducible CI configuration.

Contributor Checklist

  • Verify CI passes successfully

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added type: feature Enhancements and improvements comp: testing Testing tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes tag: dependencies Dependencies related changes labels Nov 1, 2026
@dd-octo-sts
dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from a team as code owners November 1, 2026 04:12
@dd-octo-sts
dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from PerfectSlayer, erikayasuda and mhlidd and removed request for a team November 1, 2026 04:12
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-01T04:14:39.787760Z e9ec88e PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@datadog-official datadog-official Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bits Code Review: PASS

More details

The shared YAML anchor keeps all five benchmark includes and the runtime clone pinned to the same new revision. Compatibility of the external benchmark revision was not independently validated.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit e9ec88e

@datadog-official

This comment has been minimized.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.04 s 13.93 s [-0.0%; +1.6%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.99 s 12.99 s [-0.9%; +1.0%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.15 s 16.99 s [+0.1%; +1.8%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.04 s 17.08 s [-1.1%; +0.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 16.87 s 16.95 s [-1.8%; +0.8%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 16.66 s 17.02 s [-6.7%; +2.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.22 s 15.82 s [-1.7%; +6.7%] (no difference)

Commit: e9ec88e6 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: testing Testing tag: dependencies Dependencies related changes tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes type: feature Enhancements and improvements

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants