hotfix/worm-attack-exercise

[LeeGordon83]

@hapi/wreck back to version 18.1.2

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details
npm/brace-expansion	1.1.18	🟢 7.2	Details Check Score Reason Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Maintained 🟢 10 23 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Code-Review 🟢 3 Found 6/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3 Token-Permissions 🟢 10 GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege Security-Policy 🟢 10 security policy file detected Pinned-Dependencies 🟢 10 all dependencies are pinned CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected License 🟢 9 license file detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
npm/immutable	5.1.9	🟢 7.1	Details Check Score Reason Maintained 🟢 10 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Security-Policy 🟢 10 security policy file detected Code-Review ⚠️ 1 Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Pinned-Dependencies 🟢 5 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected License 🟢 10 license file detected Fuzzing 🟢 10 project is fuzzed Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md Packaging 🟢 10 packaging workflow detected SAST 🟢 8 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
npm/js-yaml	4.3.1	🟢 6	Details Check Score Reason Maintained 🟢 10 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Code-Review ⚠️ 0 Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 Token-Permissions 🟢 10 GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo SAST ⚠️ 0 no SAST tool detected Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Pinned-Dependencies 🟢 3 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3 Fuzzing 🟢 10 project is fuzzed License 🟢 10 license file detected Branch-Protection ⚠️ 0 branch protection not enabled on development/release branches Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Security-Policy 🟢 4 security policy file detected

Scanned Files

• package-lock.json

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR rolls back the @hapi/wreck dependency to 18.1.1 as part of the “worm attack exercise”, and updates the project version/lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

• Downgrade @hapi/wreck from 18.1.2 to 18.1.1.
• Bump the application version from 5.1.0 to 5.1.1.
• Update package-lock.json (including changes to additional transitive packages beyond @hapi/wreck).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
package.json	Bumps app version and rolls @hapi/wreck back to 18.1.1.
package-lock.json	Updates the lockfile for the @hapi/wreck rollback (and also updates other locked packages).

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud