Repository navigation
Prove production Gaussian positivity and retained matrix perturbation - #6099
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits intoOct 28, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The physical Gaussian producer's scalar enclosure left denominator positivity and actual original-coordinate matrix composition open. This package proves those implications for every admitted ProductionPlan/Axis layout tuple, conditional on the scalar theorem in #6085 at
9fc80f1db55d4939c7b53c0799e6840cce35fbf8.The guards give
a_hat_j > 2^(-8p-1)and the unchangedAxis.matrix_entryconsumer satisfies||H-N_w||_infinity < p*2^(16p+4)*eta, stronger than the requestedp*2^(16p+7)*eta. The proof handles exact diagonal, zero holes, same-cell ratios, cross-cell coefficients and physical-period cuts.N_wis explicitly the ideal truncated matrix using the source's displacement convention.Validation: Python 3.12 registered normal/optimized checks pass; 64 actual encoded consumer entries under
no_decode, 150 exact geometry pairs, 3,645 denominator-sensitive scalar cases, five failure controls and the original production metadata example with seven domain rejections. Source-byte mutation is rejected. Committed-byte/source-history/mode checks and official 20-file export integrity pass; direct replay in a read-only Git-free export passes in 2.4 seconds. The supplied rational consumer fields are not a complete Axis construction or production coefficient page.All scientific input bytes are current-main
721c03822c421b7f7fcbb2598993b947c4d88419; #6085 is a cited mathematical dependency, not imported pending bytes or a repeated scalar audit. No existing/frozen source changes.Ideal infinite tails, global ideal rowgap, uniform
Axis.validate_rowsadmission, inverse/LU, full production pages, online accuracy, tensor/CRT and physical total cost remain open. No new kappa or selected-frontier change. The universal claim rests on the written source-relative proof; finite checks are corroboration by the same AI-assisted contributor, not independent human or formal-kernel acceptance.Claim: #3664 (comment)
Credit: Jose Manuel/jmbarrancoml #3851 for the physical producer and original precision/phase-cell argument; JoyboyBrian #6085 for the scalar theorem; James Reed's gaussian-gauge-column for its distinct conditional column argument; mihir-s-05 #4449 for abstract cross-cell rounding; RaD/hipotures, Chafik Boukhalfa and the retained Gaussian/physical-word lineage. Prepared by JoyboyBrian with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance, Apache-2.0.