Repository navigation
Certify that balanced depth-three chain multiplicities break every unit symmetry for m ≤ 24 (no new κ) - #6037
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 28, 2026
Conversation
…icities Exact balanced correct-word counts for m=2..24 show pairwise distinct nonzero-target counts for 3<=m<=24, so the depth-two gcd-only law does not extend to the depth-three chain.
This was referenced Oct 28, 2026
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Result
Claim type: finite certificate with a short scoped proof of its prime consequence. No closed form, call count, tariff or κ is claimed.
For the unsigned depth-three dirty chain of research/chain-tariff (#4257), let W(m,c) count balanced correct words (m copies of each call) for the target
y += c B3 B2 B1 x. Correctness is the cited interval-count criterion: N12 = N23 = 0 and N13 = c modulo m.RESULT.json.This answers the chain-tariff open question only partially: it rules out unit-invariant closed-form shapes and supplies exact data; it does not give a closed form.
Evidence and reproduction
Expected marker:
PASS_CHAIN_BALANCED_MULTIPLICITIES max_m=24. Each direct mode took about 80–90 s locally (CPython 3.12, macOS arm64), under the 300 s registered timeout.The chronological DP over letter counts and (N12, N23, N13) residues is checked against an independent gap model (ones/threes before each 2, binomial interleavings) on the full residue distribution for m ≤ 7, and against literal enumeration of every balanced word for m ≤ 5. The total mass (3m)!/(m!)^3 is checked for every m. A positive control reproduces #4236's equal depth-two counts (binom(2p,p)−2)/p at p = 2, 3, 5, 7, and a forged equal-count table is rejected. The zero counts occur exactly at the predecessor's exceptional targets (2,1), (3,2), (4,3); this is agreement, not an audit.
Limitations
Finite range m ≤ 24; no all-m distinctness, asymmetry or closed form is proved. The correctness criterion is cited from chain-tariff; no dirty-register execution is repeated. Only balanced words are counted. No supplier caller, routing, admission, precision or outer multiplication transfer is addressed. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
Open next questions
Related open work
Claim: #1166 (comment)
CI notes
Commit
88331a098ad9f0299e205bb103acc55b2dc087df: both hosted checks passed,plan(4m43s) andreplay (research/chain-balanced-multiplicities)(7m38s), in run https://github.com/CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds/actions/runs/40608876855. The run head matches the PR head.