Repository navigation
Construct optimal theta sharing in encoded-width time (no new κ) - #5966
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 28, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped written proof and deterministic exact constructor for the seven-vertex theta(2,3,3) query mask, produced by Nick Petalas.
The constructor rounds at most one fractional odd cycle and returns an integer matching/cover certificate proving optimality. It also gives the exact fixed-cover formula
nu(d)=floor(min_y d dot y / 2), withy in {0,1,2}^7covering every edge to weight at least two. The source fitting-rank theoremrank=sum(d)-nu(d)is cited, not replayed or audited. This is a theoretical encoded-width improvement, not a measured runtime speedup or new kappa.Credit JoyboyBrian #5218 for the exact theta contract, matching reduction and earlier constructor; JoyboyBrian #5023, Tekalign #3362, Nick Petalas #4909, Sagar Thakrar #2484 and the retained query-mask lineage. LP duality, half-integrality and incidence basis enumeration are classical. Advance CLAIM.
Evidence
Local CPython 3.12.15 on macOS arm64, standard library only:
{0,1,2}^7agree with an independently implemented one-copy matching recurrence; 76 have half-integer fractional optima.Exact reproduction, from the repository root:
Expected tokens:
PASS_THETA_COMPRESSED_CONSTRUCTOR,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGEandPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES. Either direct command accepts--receipt /absolute/path/outside/checkout.json.Limitations
The all-width claim rests on the written proof, including classical LP strong duality and the cited #5218 all-field fitting theorem. Finite enumeration corroborates the new constructor. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
The graph is fixed. Writing a full fitting matrix still costs its output size. No physical copying, coefficient delivery, frames, owner lifetimes, restoration, precision, fixed-tape lowering, compiler/supplier admission, new kappa or complete multiplication theorem is established. The selected frontier and its five framework assumptions remain unchanged. Lean, Docker and the selected scientific cold replay were not run because this is a scoped constructor contribution.
Open next questions
Can an actual recursive caller supply this exact ordered read mask with a favorable complete invoice? Start with a literal source incidence map and charge copies, coefficient delivery, owner lifetimes and restoration. A source-bound producer/consumer and physical tariff remain missing. No wider search is included.
Related open work
No open PR studying this same theta constructor was found in the refreshed live list and complete cached open-PR corpus. Unpublished work, arbitrary diffs and unindexed prose remain coverage limits. No extra computations were run to validate another contribution.
Completion refresh: all ten other open account PRs created after the CLAIM at 2026-10-27T16:08:05Z were inspected: #5961, #5962, #5963, #5964, #5965, #5967, #5968, #5969, #5970 and #5971. They concern minor probabilities, chronological widths, cyclic-call tariffs, rounded P104 errors, Eisenstein stage tails, Clifford tensor thresholds, observer-safe adapters, scalar rewrites, borrowed-shear endpoints and invariant lattices. None studies this theta matching number or constructor. No common numerical value or disagreement was identified, and no extra computations were run to validate those contributions.
CI notes
Both hosted checks passed at the exact contribution head
aab0f750bfa6c34b48cf5400e536e898a063cf0bin run 40539824972:planin 6m46s andreplay (research/theta-compressed-constructor)in 2m24s. The completed check list was read once. The run head and PR head match. Hosted replay certifies the registered package checks at this commit; it does not certify the universal mathematical proof or a multiplication supplier.All declared scientific commands also passed locally, as recorded above. The read-only Git-free normal and optimized exported replays passed in 9.911s and 10.171s and preserved every exported byte. Three actual optimized CLI corruptions were rejected: altered cycle rounding (
nonoptimal matching certificate), erased matching values (primal/dual gap), and weakened optimality validation (negative control accepted). The final source-hash receipt agrees between both exported replay modes. No package or mathematical changes were needed after publication.Merge danger
Door: two-way. Blast radius: isolated.
Seven new files in one opt-in package. Shared code, frozen predecessor packages, review ledgers and the selected frontier are unchanged.