Repository navigation
Prove the sharp inverse envelope with forbidden diagonals (no new κ) - #5859
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 27, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Proves the exact inverse 1-norm envelope for arbitrary finite directed supports under unequal row contraction budgets, including forbidden diagonal entries. This is a scoped algebraic proof with exact finite corroboration, not a new kappa or a complete multiplication theorem.
The proof constructs one nonnegative matrix attaining every entry of each chosen column. It extends Ali Romman's merged #5306 and #5255 by removing their all-diagonals-allowed hypothesis; their verifiers are not replayed. A loopless two-vertex example has exact envelope 14/5, compared with 6 in the larger diagonal-completed class. Missing self-loops strictly improve their own column envelope.
Proof and complete scope, standalone verifier, and source provenance.
Evidence
Exact reproduction from the repository root:
Another CPython 3.12 path can replace the displayed interpreter. Expected markers are
PASS_SUPPORT_CYCLE_RESOLVENT,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE, andPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES. Direct replay generates a JSON receipt bound to all five package-file hashes and writes no files by default.Limitations
The universal claim rests on the written proof. Finite tests are corroboration, not proof-kernel acceptance. Budgets satisfy 0<r_i<1; allowed entries may be zero. No infinite-graph, mandatory-nonzero-edge, Gaussian-specific or operator 2-norm optimum is claimed. No actual caller's support or budgets are established. Physical preparation, native operations, compiler, ownership, precision/tape, stock and analytic recovery remain separate. Selected cold replay, predecessor scientific suites, native replay, Lean and Docker are unrun. The selected frontier is unchanged.
Open next questions
Related open work
The account's open PRs created since the CLAIM at 2026-10-27T09:05:49Z were refreshed. No additional PR studying this graph-support inverse envelope was found. Merged #5306 and #5255 remain the direct predecessors.
CI notes
At commit
f585fc78fb2b38bd213d0dd78ec2ade8e10e2fc1, run 40479387415 hasplanfailed andreplayskipped. The failed planning job fails in Onboarding helper tests: all ten reported failures/errors are intests/test_research_current_assignment.py, endingFAILED (failures=8, errors=2, skipped=22)and exit code 1. This matches the shared mainde5ec2e7afailure reported on #5854 through #5859; those tests are unchanged by this PR and maintainers will repair them separately.Hosted replay has not certified this package. Only the local checks listed above have run for its scientific verification. The package replay job was skipped after planning failed. No shared tests or files outside this package were changed to bypass the failure.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Blast Radius: isolated research package. Only five new files under
research/support-cycle-resolvent/are added.This contribution was produced by Nick Petalas. Credit Ali Romman for #5255/#5306, Cinna Davis #4100 for the conditioning context, James Reed #4282 for periodic sections, and William Lawyer #852 for the different weighted-cycle setting. Classical Neumann, discounted-path and maximum-principle methods retain their credit; general literature priority is unclaimed. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. Apache-2.0.