Repository navigation
Audit native tensor cutoff and prove sharp one-axis test - #5521
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits intoOct 25, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
Conversation
Independently review PR5369 Sections 2/3/5 and corroborate them with exact phase-character enumeration and literal Gaussian ranks. Preserve the general theorem and selected frontier; disclose substantial OpenAI Codex assistance and predecessor credit.
This was referenced Oct 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR #5369 left an open request for a separate audit of its native tensor identity criterion. This reviews Sections 2, 3 and 5—phase-character realization, affine-bucket separation and residue quantifiers—and adds a sharp one-axis result: widths 3,4,5,6 suffice, and both four tests and maximum width six are necessary.
The proof and scope find no gap in those general implications under the written hypotheses. The one-axis evaluation rank is
2 min(f+1,4); an explicit nonzero residual vanishes at all positive widths below six and has entry 16 at width six. This sharpens the source's sufficient one-axis window without disputing its general theorem. A separate implementation imports no predecessor executable or arithmetic module.Package and reproduction · canonical claim/result · original handoff
Validation at head
5fe6693dd023cedddb0972f1006d7fa50ba94595:Exact result · mutation receipt
Limits: this is an agent-assisted mathematical audit with independently written finite checks, not independent human or formal-kernel acceptance. Section 6's complexity reduction, the predecessor's general compiler/native implementation, event8814 adapter and physical supplier obligations remain unreviewed here. No selected cold replay or full-history provenance preflight was run. Higher-dimensional minimum cutoffs and full nonmonomial Cliffords are separate. No new kappa or selected-frontier change.
Started from and refreshed against canonical main
32890bc5de034ab8fc93ac88ead7279a6a416d04, priority revision 7. Final overlap at 06:22 UTC covered 378 open PRs, 4,797 Discussion records and all 7,402 tracked base notes, with complete reported pagination/inventory. Hiroki KUMAZAKI's concurrent two-axis claim is complementary; this package does not claim its representation-kernel result.Ali Romman retains the general theorem and witness construction. Credit Jose Manuel, ywz65, Chris R, Douglas Colkitt, JoyboyBrian, Cinna Davis, zxv, Krzysztof Wójt and the retained source lineage. Binary symmetric factorization, Fourier inversion and central projectors are classical. Prepared for Mihir Srivastava with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance, one agent; Apache-2.0. Frozen sources and the existing archival review disposition are unchanged.