🛡️ Sentinel: [security improvement]

[seonghobae]

API 응답에 보안 헤더 추가

• Hono의 secureHeaders 미들웨어를 사용하여 API 응답에 X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection 등의 보안 헤더를 추가했습니다.
• 이를 위해 기존 server/app.mjs를 래핑하는 server/runtime-app.mjs를 생성하여 적용했습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 3957599172492886663 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 20 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 14e115c0-bbf3-4110-9e98-d77153b6e5b1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c32887 and e6df389.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)

• .jules/sentinel.md
• package.json
• server/runtime-app.mjs
• server/server.mjs
• tests/api/attachment-status.test.mjs
• tests/api/orchestrator-attribution.test.mjs
• tests/api/ratelimit.test.mjs
• tests/api/session-revocation.test.mjs
• tests/api/smoke.mjs
• tests/unit/runtime-app-coverage.test.mjs

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head product diff. Coverage is a separate gate.

Changed files

• .jules/sentinel.md — repository behavior
• package.json — repository behavior
• server/runtime-app.mjs — TypeScript or JavaScript runtime
• server/server.mjs — TypeScript or JavaScript runtime
• tests/api/attachment-status.test.mjs — regression suite
• tests/api/orchestrator-attribution.test.mjs — regression suite
• tests/api/ratelimit.test.mjs — regression suite
• tests/api/session-revocation.test.mjs — regression suite
• tests/api/smoke.mjs — regression suite
• tests/unit/runtime-app-coverage.test.mjs — regression suite

Changed behavior

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Repository file: sentinel.md"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Repository file: sentinel.md"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Repository file: package.json"]
  S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Repository file: package.json"]
  R2 --> V2["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S3["TypeScript/JavaScript: runtime-app.mjs (2 files)"]
  S3 --> I3["TypeScript or JavaScript runtime"]
  I3 --> R3["Review risk: TypeScript/JavaScript: runtime-app.mjs (2 files)"]
  R3 --> V3["package test plus coverage"]
  Evidence --> S4["Test: attachment-status.test.mjs (5 files)"]
  S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
  I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test: attachment-status.test.mjs (5 files)"]
  R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
  Evidence --> S5["Test: runtime-app-coverage.test.mjs"]
  S5 --> I5["regression suite"]
  I5 --> R5["Review risk: Test: runtime-app-coverage.test.mjs"]
  R5 --> V5["targeted test run"]

Loading

Findings

No source-backed product finding is synthesized from the coverage gate. A coverage miss belongs in the status comment.

• Head SHA: e6df389647d4a7e8527f483efea033f7f0f69b12
• Workflow run: 34414949117
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Coverage gate: failure

Review outcome

Coverage is a gate, not the review. This body reviews the changed product files.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Repository file: sentinel.md"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Repository file: sentinel.md"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["Repository file: package.json"]
  S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: Repository file: package.json"]
  R2 --> V2["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S3["TypeScript/JavaScript: runtime-app.mjs (2 files)"]
  S3 --> I3["TypeScript or JavaScript runtime"]
  I3 --> R3["Review risk: TypeScript/JavaScript: runtime-app.mjs (2 files)"]
  R3 --> V3["package test plus coverage"]
  Evidence --> S4["Test: attachment-status.test.mjs (5 files)"]
  S4 --> I4["regression suite"]
  I4 --> R4["Review risk: Test: attachment-status.test.mjs (5 files)"]
  R4 --> V4["targeted test run"]
  Evidence --> S5["Test: runtime-app-coverage.test.mjs"]
  S5 --> I5["regression suite"]
  I5 --> R5["Review risk: Test: runtime-app-coverage.test.mjs"]
  R5 --> V5["targeted test run"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: e6df389647d4a7e8527f483efea033f7f0f69b12
• Workflow run: 34414949117
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: COVERAGE_BLOCKED
• Coverage gate: failure
• Model pool: unknown
• Verdict: COVERAGE_BLOCKED
• Formal review: 🛡️ Sentinel: [security improvement] #686 (review)

Coverage evidence did not pass, so approval is blocked. The formal pull-request review is the source-backed diff review, not this status comment.