⚡ Bolt: reduce를 for 루프로 변경하여 간트 차트 렌더링 성능 개선

[seonghobae]

최종 판정

Unmerged close — 유효 semantic delta 없음.

Protected develop@2c328875e00e86537df3e965170be80532571cad 대비 원래 변경은 renderGantt() min/max 계산의 두 reduce를 한 for loop로 바꾸고 .jules/bolt.md에 일반화된 성능 doctrine을 추가한 것이었습니다. 실제/right-cleared ScopeWeave workload에서 이 계산이 p95 병목이라는 profile·wall-clock·CPU·allocation/GC evidence가 없고 두 구현 모두 선형 시간이므로 commercial performance repair로 인정하지 않았습니다.

Ordinary-forward descendant e545c4ff87de100bd72657de6813144d63971f1b에서 app.js와 .jules/bolt.md를 protected base exact blobs로 복원했습니다. Fresh compare 결과 base 대비 ahead_by=2, behind_by=0, **effective files=[]**입니다. 따라서 보존할 production/test/fixture/contract/evidence delta가 없어 close 조건을 충족합니다.

이 close는 간트 성능이 충분하다는 뜻이 아닙니다. 실제 buyer workload에서 material p95 병목이 profile되면 별도 lane에서 realistic benchmark RED부터 시작합니다.

No force push/rebase, no unsupported performance claim, no gate weakening.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode reviewed the current-head product diff. Coverage is a separate gate.

Changed files

• .jules/bolt.md — repository behavior
• app.js — TypeScript or JavaScript runtime

Changed behavior

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Repository file: bolt.md"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Repository file: bolt.md"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["TypeScript/JavaScript: app.js"]
  S2 --> I2["TypeScript or JavaScript runtime"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: TypeScript/JavaScript: app.js"]
  R2 --> V2["package test plus coverage"]

Loading

Findings

No source-backed product finding is synthesized from the coverage gate. A coverage miss belongs in the status comment.

• Head SHA: 1efc366989e8fa116484017993ee4f3d3eb5601c
• Workflow run: 34362538872
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Coverage gate: failure

Review outcome

Coverage is a gate, not the review. This body reviews the changed product files.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Repository file: bolt.md"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Repository file: bolt.md"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
  Evidence --> S2["TypeScript/JavaScript: app.js"]
  S2 --> I2["TypeScript or JavaScript runtime"]
  I2 --> R2["Review risk: TypeScript/JavaScript: app.js"]
  R2 --> V2["package test plus coverage"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 1efc366989e8fa116484017993ee4f3d3eb5601c
• Workflow run: 34362538872
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: COVERAGE_BLOCKED
• Coverage gate: failure
• Model pool: unknown
• Verdict: COVERAGE_BLOCKED
• Formal review: ⚡ Bolt: reduce를 for 루프로 변경하여 간트 차트 렌더링 성능 개선 #684 (review)

Coverage evidence did not pass, so approval is blocked. The formal pull-request review is the source-backed diff review, not this status comment.

[seonghobae]

@jules protected develop@2c328875e00e86537df3e965170be80532571cad의 exact blob을 기준으로 app.js와 .jules/bolt.md 두 파일만 ordinary-forward 복원해 주세요. 이 PR의 speculative reduce→for 성능 delta와 feature-local Bolt doctrine을 제거하려는 것입니다. force push/rebase 없이 descendant commit으로 처리하고, 다른 파일은 변경하지 마십시오. 완료 후 exact head와 base 대비 effective diff를 남겨 주세요.