🎨 Palette: [에디터 폼 접근성 개선 - 저장 버튼 aria-disabled 적용]

[seonghobae]

Current authority — 2026-09-08

• protected base recorded by PR: develop@2c328875e00e86537df3e965170be80532571cad
• semantic feature commit: e54803ff179b07f06ecdc23aa2aa890202d0b14b
• current exact head: 05fc626253f007e7ca237fee53adabf1b96b2cd6
• lifecycle: Draft / source-neutral CI wakeup repaired / material-UI acceptance pending

The accessibility delta remains two files: app.js plus .jules/palette.md. It keeps the save control focusable through aria-disabled, intercepts invalid submission to show the existing actionable toast, and disables browser-native constraint popups so the product-owned validation path remains authoritative.

Fresh history review found an invalid second commit, 3f72827b50cc248a67f1bdb7d77aae459ecc4950 (ci: re-kick required checks to bypass flake). That commit changed index.html only by adding unrelated module-preload hints for cloud-sync.js and analytics.js; those preloads were not part of the accessibility contract and were being used as source churn to wake required checks. The fleet contract forbids source-neutral/no-op retrigger commits.

Ordinary descendant 05fc626253f007e7ca237fee53adabf1b96b2cd6 preserves both prior commits in ancestry and restores index.html to the exact semantic-feature blob from e54803ff.... No force push or destructive rebase was used. Fresh compare e54803ff... → 05fc626... is ahead 2 / behind 0 / files [], proving the CI-wakeup delta has no surviving tree effect while the original accessibility change remains intact.

All current-head workflows are fresh after that repair: Server Tests and Security Scan are queued, CodeQL PR and SAST are pending, and Fuzz is in progress. Predecessor workflow receipts are not transferred.

Remaining UI RED → GREEN acceptance

The source direction is plausible but material-UI completion is not yet established. Add executed browser coverage for invalid-form keyboard focus, Enter/click submission, toast announcement, aria-disabled state transitions, valid-save recovery, and interaction with required/date validation after noValidate=true. Verify that the toast is exposed through the existing live/status semantics rather than being merely visible. Capture current-head normal/invalid/error screenshots and accessibility-tree evidence at narrow/intermediate/desktop widths; check visible focus, contrast, touch target, text wrapping/expansion and the actually supported KO/EN/JA/ZH/VI/ES/DE/FR locale boundary. Do not claim locale support that this surface does not implement.

Delivery Gate: intentionality PASS; content fit PASS; functional completeness PENDING; resilience PENDING; evidence FAIL until rendered/browser/a11y evidence exists; uniqueness N/A for this interaction-state repair. Keep Draft until these gates, fresh exact-head CI/security checks, zero valid review findings, and qualifying independent review are complete.

No source-neutral retrigger, self-approval, synthetic status, force push, destructive rebase, or gate weakening.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 6c54a0e7-9cf9-4e51-8fa4-d721f11bc2ec

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c32887 and e54803f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .jules/palette.md
• app.js

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

에디터 폼은 기본 HTML5 검증 팝업을 비활성화합니다. 검증 오류는 저장 버튼의 aria-disabled 상태로 표시합니다. 오류 상태에서 제출하면 저장을 중단하고 안내 토스트를 표시합니다.

Changes

에디터 폼 검증 및 제출 흐름

Layer / File(s)	Summary
검증 상태 및 폼 설정 app.js, .jules/palette.md	에디터 폼에 noValidate = true를 설정합니다. 검증 오류가 있으면 저장 버튼에 aria-disabled="true"를 설정하고 disabled는 false로 유지합니다. 관련 동작을 학습 항목에 기록합니다.
제출 차단 및 토스트 피드백 app.js	저장 버튼이 aria-disabled="true"이면 saveEditor() 호출을 중단하고 안내 토스트를 표시합니다.

Priority: ⬇️ Low — Defer the editor form accessibility change because its scope is limited to save-button state handling, custom validation feedback, and a small documentation update.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e5480

The editor save button remains focusable while conveying validation state to assistive technology, and invalid save attempts are blocked with explanatory feedback. The change is ready to merge.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 3 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 …	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	제목은 에디터 폼의 저장 버튼에 aria-disabled를 적용하는 주요 변경 사항을 명확하게 설명합니다.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 3 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

📝 Generate docstrings 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch palette-aria-disabled-save-button-8188283885938502576

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}