docs(recovery): classify #616 as protected authority - #617
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughWorker 복구 문서가 배포 생성 응답을 권위 있는 활성 상태로 사용하지 않도록 갱신되었습니다. 복구 성공 전에 새 배포 UUID와 canonical 트래픽 분포를 provider 상태 조회로 검증합니다. 기준선과 문서 테스트가 PR ChangesWorker 복구 권위 검증
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Change: Other ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
seonghobae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Current-head review on 38b3b56837d875d19ae458f3f5491951ad7afb1c: the three-file documentation/test delta correctly classifies protected #616 post-mutation provider-status verification without promoting source integration to controlled recovery/release evidence. The moving baseline keeps ADR-0018 Proposed, issue #611 open, and foreign/provider authority outside Noema. Fresh applicable CI, reviewer-ci, Security Scan, and patch-validator-image are all terminal GREEN; no inline review threads are present. No additional valid source/DDD/authority/test/documentation finding found in this exact head.
Problem
#616 is now protected source at
main@a318ca0f9a6268e014ebd71f3e08b8fe773d9f5b, but the moving recovery baseline and OPERABILITY text still stopped at #612/#614. That left canonical docs behind code: post-mutation Cloudflare status verification is protected source, while controlled production recovery rehearsal remains unproven.Documentation regression
Test-only exact
4534c4bc1732e9503b26476133a89a1f0da44ce7tightened the executable documentation contract to require #616 classification, mutation-acknowledgement vs fresh post-mutation provider-status separation, lowercase UUID canonical identity, ADR-0018Proposed, and the remaining production-rehearsal gap. Its hosted application CI reached release tests but was cancelled by the subsequent documentation repair push, so it is retained as the test-first predecessor but not claimed as a terminal hosted RED.Causal repair
Current exact
38b3b56837d875d19ae458f3f5491951ad7afb1cchanges only canonical documentation plus that executable documentation regression:da8461f1..., updates the recovery lineage to fix(recovery): preserve pre-deployment traffic authority #612/fix(recovery): canonicalize UUID authority identities #614/fix(recovery): verify exact provider state after mutation #616, and keeps deploy: preserve pre-deployment traffic authority in rollback evidence #611 open for immutable release + controlled rehearsal evidence;Proposed; source integration is not promoted to deployment/recovery/SLO/release evidence.No recovery source behavior, foreign-owner authority, provider routing, gate, or deployment mutation is changed by this PR.
Current gate
Every documentation mutation invalidates predecessor workflow evidence. Current-head exact
38b3b568...must independently reach terminal applicable application CI, reviewer-ci, Security Scan and patch-validator-image, with clean fresh review/thread/base checks, before normal merge.Summary by CodeRabbit
문서
테스트