Retain Swift Data summary precision blocker - #246
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The independent Swift Data/Base64/String control finds a false flow through constant-body local lookalikes. Retain the blocked result: the canonical summary pair remains unrun and no scored configuration is activated.
Key Changes:
Touch Points:
adapters/codeql/swift-summary-v1/queries/evidence/swift-summary-qualification-v1/scripts/run-swift-summary-control.py,scripts/trace-swift-summary-stores.pyscripts/verify-swift-summary-control.py,scripts/test-swift-summary-control.py.github/workflows/ci.yml,.gitattributes, Swift qualification documentationValidation: three test methods with seven semantic and four copied-evidence mutations passed, including from a clean Git export. Previous sanitizer/append/pending-integration verifiers,
cargo fmt --check, and diff checks passed. Extraction completed in 111.512 seconds; all six original queries and the 13.034-second store query succeeded under the 150-second extraction / 60-second query / 2048 MiB diagnostic request. The reused database's 422 non-cache source-data hashes and source archive were checked. Aggregate memory compliance and semantic completeness remain unproven. CI pending.Refs #220 and #215. Both issues remain open; acceptance is incomplete. Append and sanitizer blockers remain independent. No full-corpus execution, scored activation, freeze, or publication.