ForegroundServiceStartNotAllowedException crashes BackgroundService on Android 14+

[TimeToBuildBob]

Problem

The remaining top Play crash on v0.14.0b2 (versionCode 40) is an uncaught ForegroundServiceStartNotAllowedException while BackgroundService.onCreate() promotes itself with ServiceCompat.startForeground().

A live, time-bounded Play Developer Reporting API query on 2026-09-13 shows:

Window (UTC)	Reports	Distinct users
Last 24h	41	14
Last 7d	475	83
Last 21d	928	142

The cluster is still active (lastErrorReportTime: 2026-09-12T23:00:00Z), spans Android API 34–37, and only names versionCode 40. This is now larger than the residual old-version ChromeWatcher cluster.

Primary Play issue ID: b422f7bf3b71b095ad1cf06a3079e0f0.

Stack trace

Exception java.lang.RuntimeException:
  at android.app.ActivityThread.handleCreateService (...)
Caused by android.app.ForegroundServiceStartNotAllowedException:
  at android.app.IActivityManager$Stub$Proxy.setServiceForeground (...)
  at android.app.Service.startForeground (...)
  at androidx.core.app.ServiceCompat$Api34Impl.startForeground (ServiceCompat.java:241)
  at androidx.core.app.ServiceCompat.startForeground (ServiceCompat.java:172)
  at net.activitywatch.android.BackgroundService.onCreate (BackgroundService.kt:51)

There is a second, distinct cluster at the caller boundary:

Caused by android.app.ForegroundServiceStartNotAllowedException:
  at android.app.ContextImpl.startForegroundService (...)
  at net.activitywatch.android.watcher.AlarmReceiver.onReceive (AlarmReceiver.kt:22)

That companion cluster contributes another 7 reports / 5 users in 7d (26 / 10 in 21d), on API 33–37, also versionCode 40.

Current paths and likely trigger

Current master still has both unguarded boundaries:

1. AlarmReceiver starts BackgroundService from BOOT_COMPLETED with startForegroundService().
2. BackgroundService.onCreate() always calls ServiceCompat.startForeground().
3. onStartCommand() returns START_STICKY, allowing Android to recreate the service after process death while the app is backgrounded.

MainActivity also starts the service, but that path starts from a visible activity and is expected to be allowed.

The primary stack does not preserve the initiating intent, so Play data alone cannot prove whether every occurrence is a sticky restart, a boot start whose promotion is rejected, or an OEM lifecycle edge. The START_STICKY background-recreation path is the leading hypothesis; the separate AlarmReceiver.onReceive cluster proves that boot/background launch is independently unsafe. This issue should fix both exception boundaries rather than guessing one caller explains all reports.

Scope

• Gracefully handle a rejected startForegroundService() in AlarmReceiver on API 31+; a boot broadcast must never crash the process.
• Gracefully handle a rejected ServiceCompat.startForeground() in BackgroundService; stop without running native/server initialization or entering a crash/restart loop.
• Re-evaluate START_STICKY: retain it only if a system-initiated background recreation can legally promote the service on supported Android versions. Otherwise use an explicit allowed restart path.
• Preserve the normal foreground launch from MainActivity.
• Add lifecycle diagnostics identifying the start origin (activity, boot, sticky/null-intent, settings) so future Play clusters can be attributed.

Restoring collection/server availability after an OEM kills the service is related but separate work in #252. This issue's minimum outcome is no process crash when Android refuses foreground-service startup; silently pretending the service is alive is not acceptable either.

Acceptance criteria

• A denied startForegroundService() from AlarmReceiver is caught and logged, with no app crash.
• A denied startForeground() during service creation stops cleanly before Rust/server/scheduler initialization, with no app crash or restart loop.
• Normal launch from MainActivity still starts the foreground service and local server.
• Boot behavior is verified on API 34 and API 36+ (or the unsupported boundary is documented and surfaced to the user).
• A simulated/system-initiated service recreation while backgrounded does not crash.
• After release, the two Play issue IDs are re-queried over a comparable 7-day window and show no new reports on the fixed versionCode.

Data reproduction

The bounded query is available on ActivityWatch/stats#28:

uv run vitals.py errors --days 7 --limit 100 --stacktraces --markdown

Related: #185, #176, #252, ActivityWatch/stats#28.

[ErikBjare]

@TimeToBuildBob fix it

[TimeToBuildBob]

Fixed in #257.

The PR guards both rejection boundaries, stops before native/server initialization if foreground promotion fails, removes unsafe sticky recreation, and logs the start origin. Targeted unit tests pass and the local AI review is 5/5. CI is running; API 34/36 device verification remains the post-build/release gate.