Skip to content

Commit ce93780

Browse files
committed
Add lawyer question re: "disciplinary process"
1 parent 2b0e8fc commit ce93780

1 file changed

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

TODO.md

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
1313
- [ ] 34.1.(ii) Similarly, "in the opinion of the Committee or the Society" this
1414
determination of disrepute seems to bypass the dispute resolution process? What
1515
would be a practical situation where this is justifiably used?
16+
- [ ] Further to the above two clauses, there is 17.2. distinguising between a
17+
"disciplinary" and a dispute resolution process. Wondering if a GM is required to
18+
re-admit a former Member, maybe it should only be a GM that can perform a
19+
"disciplinary process" - or is that impractical?
1620
- [ ] 42.3.(iv) "or Member's rights or interests generally have been damaged" - does
1721
this not open us up to disputes that are unrelated to the society (other than the
1822
parties are members)? Potentially leading to mediation costs covered by the

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)