You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+3-1Lines changed: 3 additions & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ Default Containerized Application Labels used to document the application and/or
4
4
With the introduction of the [Atomic command](http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/04/21/introducing-the-atomic-command/), we are accessing container image meta data to describe the purpose of the image or the application defined by the image.
5
5
6
6
We would like to get concensus on default names. Proposals have been made to namespace the label names defined
7
-
in Docker. But we believe their should be some generic toplevel names defined that are not vendor specific, or
7
+
in Docker.
8
+
9
+
But we believe their should be some generic toplevel names defined that are not vendor specific, or
0 commit comments