diff --git a/scripts/check-stale-todo-markers.mjs b/scripts/check-stale-todo-markers.mjs
index bdf5833..b1baafb 100755
--- a/scripts/check-stale-todo-markers.mjs
+++ b/scripts/check-stale-todo-markers.mjs
@@ -30,10 +30,20 @@
 //  (a) REUSED head-branch name — a branch name may be reused after its first
 //      PR merged. `resolveEntry` prefers an OPEN PR for the branch, so
 //      still-in-flight work is not flagged stale WHILE that OPEN PR exists.
-//      Residual gap: a reused branch whose new work has not yet opened a PR
-//      still resolves via the old MERGED PR and reads STALE — durable PR
-//      identity on the marker (not just a branch name) is the real fix,
-//      tracked in the TODO backlog.
+//      Residual gap (ACCEPTED limitation, not a bug): a reused branch whose new
+//      work has not yet opened a PR still resolves via the old MERGED PR and
+//      reads STALE. A durable fix would need a repo-bound PR identity (number
+//      or head SHA) recorded on the 🚧 marker and verified here — but the
+//      marker is written by next-todo's claim BEFORE any PR exists, so that
+//      identity would have to be back-filled by a new step in the *global*
+//      /ship or /merge-pr flow and kept in lockstep across four skills, all to
+//      serve this LOCAL-only advisory backstop. The false-positive window is
+//      narrow (reused branch + old merged PR + no new PR opened yet + the check
+//      run in exactly that window), and the merged-no-open path is ALSO this
+//      tool's primary genuine-stale signal, so it cannot be downgraded to a
+//      warning without gutting detection. Decision: accept the
+//      branch-name-identity limitation. Full cost/rarity weighing:
+//      .claude/docs/LEARNING.md → "Claude Workflow" (2026-07-29).
 //  (b) NUMBER-ONLY match — PR numbers are reused across repo generations, so a
 //      match resting solely on a `(#N)` / `(PR #N)` number is REPORT-ONLY
 //      (a warning), never a hard STALE verdict. A conforming in-flight entry
@@ -146,8 +156,9 @@ export function resolveEntry({ branch, pr }, ghRunner) {
     // same-named PR merged. Query OPEN on its own (not a truncated `--state
     // all` slice) so a busy reused branch can't hide the in-flight PR behind
     // a result cap. (If no new PR has been opened yet for a reused branch,
-    // this still falls through to the MERGED check below and reads stale —
-    // a fundamental branch-name-identity limitation, not a bug here.)
+    // this still falls through to the MERGED check below and reads stale — a
+    // fundamental branch-name-identity limitation, ACCEPTED as a known gap, not
+    // a bug here. Rationale: header note (a) + LEARNING.md 2026-07-29.)
     const open = ghRunner([
       "pr",
       "list",
diff --git a/test/build/stale-todo-markers.test.ts b/test/build/stale-todo-markers.test.ts
index 3a9787d..06e1145 100644
--- a/test/build/stale-todo-markers.test.ts
+++ b/test/build/stale-todo-markers.test.ts
@@ -91,6 +91,12 @@ describe("resolveEntry — fix (a): reused branch prefers an OPEN PR", () => {
     expect(resolveEntry({ branch: "feat/x", pr: null }, gh).status).toBe("clean");
   });
 
+  // This "no-OPEN + MERGED → stale" case is also the pin for the ACCEPTED
+  // branch-name-identity limitation (a reused branch with an old merged PR and
+  // no new PR opened yet reads stale — a documented, intentional gap, not a bug;
+  // see the script header note (a) + LEARNING.md 2026-07-29). Do not soften this
+  // to a warning without revisiting that decision — it is the tool's primary
+  // genuine-stale signal.
   it("returns stale when there is NO open PR and a merged one exists (exit-1 contract)", () => {
     const gh = makeGh({
       list: { "feat/x": { open: [], merged: [{ number: 42, title: "shipped" }] } },