Skip to content

Improve the section on authoritative resource algebras #1

Description

@jihgfee

The section on authoritative resource algebras could benefit from a slight rewriting.
Some salient points:

  • The generally presented rules for the RA are not sufficient for deriving the properties of the fractional use case
  • There are some erratas, see below

Known erratas:

  • The specifications of Exercise 8.52 do not recover the spatial isCounter predicate in the post-condition.
  • Many definition use multiple ∀ x. ∀ y. ∀ z. _ rather than the iterated ∀ x, y, z. _
  • The first RA construction uses m/n for the fragmental piece, but the generalised construction uses a/b

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions