Skip to content

Commit 869f538

Browse files
edumazetgregkh
authored andcommitted
tcp: fix TCP_REPAIR_QUEUE bound checking
commit bf2acc9 upstream. syzbot is able to produce a nasty WARN_ON() in tcp_verify_left_out() with following C-repro : socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3 setsockopt(3, SOL_TCP, TCP_REPAIR, [1], 4) = 0 setsockopt(3, SOL_TCP, TCP_REPAIR_QUEUE, [-1], 4) = 0 bind(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(20002), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0 sendto(3, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1242, MSG_FASTOPEN, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(20002), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 1242 setsockopt(3, SOL_TCP, TCP_REPAIR_WINDOW, "\4\0\0@+\205\0\0\377\377\0\0\377\377\377\177\0\0\0\0", 20) = 0 writev(3, [{"\270", 1}], 1) = 1 setsockopt(3, SOL_TCP, TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS, "\10\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0|\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 386) = 0 writev(3, [{"\210v\r[\226\320t\231qwQ\204\264l\254\t\1\20\245\214p\350H\223\254;\\\37\345\307p$"..., 3144}], 1) = 3144 The 3rd system call looks odd : setsockopt(3, SOL_TCP, TCP_REPAIR_QUEUE, [-1], 4) = 0 This patch makes sure bound checking is using an unsigned compare. Fixes: ee99528 ("tcp: Initial repair mode") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
1 parent 68447d6 commit 869f538

1 file changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion

File tree

net/ipv4/tcp.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2523,7 +2523,7 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
25232523
case TCP_REPAIR_QUEUE:
25242524
if (!tp->repair)
25252525
err = -EPERM;
2526-
else if (val < TCP_QUEUES_NR)
2526+
else if ((unsigned int)val < TCP_QUEUES_NR)
25272527
tp->repair_queue = val;
25282528
else
25292529
err = -EINVAL;

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)