Commit 1be5d4f
locking/rtmutex: Use READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner()
While debugging the rtmutex unlock vs. dequeue race Will suggested to use
READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner() as it might race against the
cmpxchg_release() in unlock_rt_mutex_safe().
Will: "It's a minor thing which will most likely not matter in practice"
Careful search did not unearth an actual problem in todays code, but it's
better to be safe than surprised.
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130210030.431379999@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>1 parent dbb2605 commit 1be5d4f
1 file changed
Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
75 | 75 | | |
76 | 76 | | |
77 | 77 | | |
78 | | - | |
79 | | - | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
80 | 81 | | |
81 | 82 | | |
82 | 83 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments