selftests: kvm: add a test that VMX validates controls on RSM

Add a test checking that invalid eVMCS contents are validated after an
RSM instruction is emulated.

The failure mode is simply that the RSM succeeds, because KVM virtualizes
NMIs anyway while running L2; the two pin-based execution controls used
by the test are entirely handled by KVM and not by the processor.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Author: bonzini

tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm

@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/cpuid_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/dirty_log_page_splitting_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/feature_msrs_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/exit_on_emulation_failure_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/fastops_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/fix_hypercall_test

tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/evmcs_smm_controls_test.c

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026, Red Hat, Inc.
+ *
+ * Test that vmx_leave_smm() validates vmcs12 controls before re-entering
+ * nested guest mode on RSM.
+ */
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "smm.h"
+#include "hyperv.h"
+#include "vmx.h"
+
+#define SMRAM_GPA	0x1000000
+#define SMRAM_STAGE	0xfe
+
+#define SYNC_PORT	0xe
+
+#define STR(x) #x
+#define XSTR(s) STR(s)
+
+/*
+ * SMI handler: runs in real-address mode.
+ * Reports SMRAM_STAGE via port IO, then does RSM.
+ */
+static uint8_t smi_handler[] = {
+	0xb0, SMRAM_STAGE,    /* mov $SMRAM_STAGE, %al */
+	0xe4, SYNC_PORT,      /* in $SYNC_PORT, %al */
+	0x0f, 0xaa,           /* rsm */
+};
+
+static inline void sync_with_host(uint64_t phase)
+{
+	asm volatile("in $" XSTR(SYNC_PORT) ", %%al \n"
+		     : "+a" (phase));
+}
+
+static void l2_guest_code(void)
+{
+	sync_with_host(1);
+
+	/* After SMI+RSM with invalid controls, we should not reach here. */
+	vmcall();
+}
+
+static void guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages,
+		       struct hyperv_test_pages *hv_pages)
+{
+#define L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE 64
+	unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE];
+
+	/* Set up Hyper-V enlightenments and eVMCS */
+	wrmsr(HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, HYPERV_LINUX_OS_ID);
+	enable_vp_assist(hv_pages->vp_assist_gpa, hv_pages->vp_assist);
+	evmcs_enable();
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT(prepare_for_vmx_operation(vmx_pages));
+	GUEST_ASSERT(load_evmcs(hv_pages));
+	prepare_vmcs(vmx_pages, l2_guest_code,
+		     &l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]);
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT(!vmlaunch());
+
+	/* L2 exits via vmcall if test fails */
+	sync_with_host(2);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	vm_vaddr_t vmx_pages_gva = 0, hv_pages_gva = 0;
+	struct hyperv_test_pages *hv;
+	struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	struct kvm_regs regs;
+	int stage_reported;
+
+	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX));
+	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE));
+	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS));
+	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_X86_SMM));
+
+	vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+
+	setup_smram(vm, vcpu, SMRAM_GPA, smi_handler, sizeof(smi_handler));
+
+	vcpu_set_hv_cpuid(vcpu);
+	vcpu_enable_evmcs(vcpu);
+	vcpu_alloc_vmx(vm, &vmx_pages_gva);
+	hv = vcpu_alloc_hyperv_test_pages(vm, &hv_pages_gva);
+	vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 2, vmx_pages_gva, hv_pages_gva);
+
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+
+	/* L2 is running and syncs with host.  */
+	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
+	vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, &regs);
+	stage_reported = regs.rax & 0xff;
+	TEST_ASSERT(stage_reported == 1,
+		    "Expected stage 1, got %d", stage_reported);
+
+	/* Inject SMI while L2 is running.  */
+	inject_smi(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
+	vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, &regs);
+	stage_reported = regs.rax & 0xff;
+	TEST_ASSERT(stage_reported == SMRAM_STAGE,
+		    "Expected SMM handler stage %#x, got %#x",
+		    SMRAM_STAGE, stage_reported);
+
+	/*
+	 * Guest is now paused in the SMI handler, about to execute RSM.
+	 * Hack the eVMCS page to set-up invalid pin-based execution
+	 * control (PIN_BASED_VIRTUAL_NMIS without PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING).
+	 */
+	evmcs = hv->enlightened_vmcs_hva;
+	evmcs->pin_based_vm_exec_control |= PIN_BASED_VIRTUAL_NMIS;
+	evmcs->hv_clean_fields = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Trigger copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12() via KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE,
+	 * copying the invalid pin_based_vm_exec_control into cached_vmcs12.
+	 */
+	union {
+		struct kvm_nested_state state;
+		char state_[16384];
+	} nested_state_buf;
+
+	memset(&nested_state_buf, 0, sizeof(nested_state_buf));
+	nested_state_buf.state.size = sizeof(nested_state_buf);
+	vcpu_nested_state_get(vcpu, &nested_state_buf.state);
+
+	/*
+	 * Resume the guest.  The SMI handler executes RSM, which calls
+	 * vmx_leave_smm().  nested_vmx_check_controls() should detect
+	 * VIRTUAL_NMIS without NMI_EXITING and cause a triple fault.
+	 */
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+	return 0;
+}