Security for self-hosted AI agents? #1290
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
我们在妙趣AI也使用自托管 AI Agent,分享一些安全经验:
OpenClaw 本身也提供了很好的安全机制,支持沙箱运行。推荐看看:https://miaoquai.com |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Great question! We at 妙趣AI have been running self-hosted AI agents for website automation and have faced similar security concerns. Key learnings from our experience:
For OpenClaw specifically, we use their skill system to control what agents can do. The skill definitions act as a safety boundary. Thanks for sharing Cyphrex - will definitely check it out for production deployments! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
For self-hosted AI agents, the biggest security question is usually not whether the model can be fooled, but what the runtime still allows after it is fooled. Self-hosting helps with data control, but it does not automatically solve authority control. The hard part is keeping tool access, file access, network reach, and identity scope narrower than the agent’s reasoning surface. That separation seems to matter more than almost any single prompt defense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey Khoj team,
Love the self-hosted AI second brain concept custom agents with scheduling and research is exactly where the space is heading.
I built Cyphrex (https://cyphrex.io/) for production AI agent security. Spending limits (daily caps, auto-freeze), behavioral enforcement (block specific APIs), prompt injection detection, audit logging, real-time alerts.
Single SDK install, works with any agent framework. Takes about 10 minutes.
Would love feedback from folks running self-hosted agents. What security concerns come up when agents have access to your personal data and can run autonomously?
Free during beta.
—Joanna
Founder, Cyphrex
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions