There is evidence from Allen https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.12.687966v1 that the clustering of KS4 is superior to KS2.5.
Furthermore, we want to pave the way to comparing different clustering algorithms such as Lupin and Dartsort, using the same pre and post processing.
There is also an incentive to move to spike interface for the drift detection, the clustering and the post-processing, for ease of maintenance. For a first pass, we can keep the pre-processing from ibl-neuropixel as some features are not yet in spike interface.
Data Preparation
Reveal websites
Post-processing
Drift correction
Spike-sorter
Results Integrity
There is evidence from Allen https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.12.687966v1 that the clustering of KS4 is superior to KS2.5.
Furthermore, we want to pave the way to comparing different clustering algorithms such as Lupin and Dartsort, using the same pre and post processing.
There is also an incentive to move to spike interface for the drift detection, the clustering and the post-processing, for ease of maintenance. For a first pass, we can keep the pre-processing from ibl-neuropixel as some features are not yet in spike interface.
Data Preparation
[ ] run pre-processing from ibl-neuropixel. Do we need to export as kilosort 2.5 or flat binary is fine for spike interface ?Reveal websites
Post-processing
Drift correction
Spike-sorter
Results Integrity