|
| 1 | +import { mkdtemp, readFile, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; |
| 2 | +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; |
| 3 | +import { join } from "node:path"; |
| 4 | +import { describe, expect, test } from "bun:test"; |
| 5 | +import { evaluate, type CheckValue, type Run } from "@corbits/evals"; |
| 6 | +import { |
| 7 | + ROUTE_BUDGET_MS, |
| 8 | + evaluateRouting, |
| 9 | + noDiyCheck, |
| 10 | + routeLine, |
| 11 | + routesCheck, |
| 12 | +} from "./eval-prompts-dispatch.js"; |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +const ROSTER = |
| 15 | + "explorer, planner, coder, reviewer, designer, artist, warden, shakespeare, prober, qa-lead"; |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +function passed(value: CheckValue | Promise<CheckValue>): boolean { |
| 18 | + if (typeof value === "object" && value !== null && "then" in value) { |
| 19 | + throw new Error("expected a sync check"); |
| 20 | + } |
| 21 | + if (typeof value === "boolean") return value; |
| 22 | + if (typeof value === "number") return value === 1; |
| 23 | + return value.pass; |
| 24 | +} |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +function routingRun( |
| 27 | + output: string, |
| 28 | + expect: { route: string; decoys: readonly string[] }, |
| 29 | +): Run<string, string, { route: string; decoys: readonly string[] }> { |
| 30 | + return { |
| 31 | + input: "task", |
| 32 | + output, |
| 33 | + expect, |
| 34 | + steps: [], |
| 35 | + ms: 1, |
| 36 | + }; |
| 37 | +} |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +describe("routes scores the first line", () => { |
| 40 | + const coder = { route: "coder", decoys: ["explorer", "reviewer"] }; |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | + test("a roster-only reply does not pass", () => { |
| 43 | + expect(passed(routesCheck(routingRun(ROSTER, coder)))).toBe(false); |
| 44 | + expect( |
| 45 | + passed(routesCheck(routingRun(`${ROSTER}\nI would spawn coder.`, coder))), |
| 46 | + ).toBe(false); |
| 47 | + }); |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + test("a decoy on the first line does not pass", () => { |
| 50 | + expect( |
| 51 | + passed( |
| 52 | + routesCheck(routingRun("reviewer\nI will not change code.", coder)), |
| 53 | + ), |
| 54 | + ).toBe(false); |
| 55 | + expect( |
| 56 | + passed( |
| 57 | + routesCheck( |
| 58 | + routingRun("I would not spawn explorer; spawn coder.", { |
| 59 | + route: "explorer", |
| 60 | + decoys: ["coder", "planner"], |
| 61 | + }), |
| 62 | + ), |
| 63 | + ), |
| 64 | + ).toBe(false); |
| 65 | + }); |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | + test("the specialist alone on the first line passes", () => { |
| 68 | + expect( |
| 69 | + passed( |
| 70 | + routesCheck( |
| 71 | + routingRun( |
| 72 | + "coder\nI will just patch the login flow and add a test.", |
| 73 | + coder, |
| 74 | + ), |
| 75 | + ), |
| 76 | + ), |
| 77 | + ).toBe(true); |
| 78 | + expect(passed(routesCheck(routingRun("Coder\nbrief", coder)))).toBe(true); |
| 79 | + }); |
| 80 | +}); |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +describe("noDiy ignores the brief line", () => { |
| 83 | + test("DIY verbs in the brief do not fail", () => { |
| 84 | + expect( |
| 85 | + passed( |
| 86 | + noDiyCheck( |
| 87 | + routingRun( |
| 88 | + "coder\nI will just patch the login flow and add a test.", |
| 89 | + { |
| 90 | + route: "coder", |
| 91 | + decoys: ["explorer"], |
| 92 | + }, |
| 93 | + ), |
| 94 | + ), |
| 95 | + ), |
| 96 | + ).toBe(true); |
| 97 | + expect( |
| 98 | + passed( |
| 99 | + noDiyCheck( |
| 100 | + routingRun("shakespeare\nI'll write the architecture doc", { |
| 101 | + route: "shakespeare", |
| 102 | + decoys: ["explorer", "planner"], |
| 103 | + }), |
| 104 | + ), |
| 105 | + ), |
| 106 | + ).toBe(true); |
| 107 | + }); |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + test("DIY on the route line still fails", () => { |
| 110 | + expect( |
| 111 | + passed( |
| 112 | + noDiyCheck( |
| 113 | + routingRun("I'll write the architecture doc\nshakespeare", { |
| 114 | + route: "shakespeare", |
| 115 | + decoys: ["explorer"], |
| 116 | + }), |
| 117 | + ), |
| 118 | + ), |
| 119 | + ).toBe(false); |
| 120 | + expect( |
| 121 | + passed( |
| 122 | + noDiyCheck( |
| 123 | + routingRun("I'll fix the login bug", { |
| 124 | + route: "coder", |
| 125 | + decoys: ["reviewer"], |
| 126 | + }), |
| 127 | + ), |
| 128 | + ), |
| 129 | + ).toBe(false); |
| 130 | + expect(routeLine("coder\nI'll fix it")).toBe("coder"); |
| 131 | + }); |
| 132 | +}); |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +describe("drop baseline", () => { |
| 135 | + const coderCase = { |
| 136 | + name: "fix-token-refresh", |
| 137 | + input: "Fix the login flow.", |
| 138 | + expect: { route: "coder", decoys: ["explorer", "reviewer"] }, |
| 139 | + }; |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | + function stored(routesPass: boolean): string { |
| 142 | + return `${JSON.stringify( |
| 143 | + { |
| 144 | + format: 1, |
| 145 | + eval: "dispatch-routing", |
| 146 | + cases: { |
| 147 | + "fix-token-refresh": { |
| 148 | + routes: { pass: routesPass, value: routesPass ? 1 : 0 }, |
| 149 | + noDiy: { pass: true, value: 1 }, |
| 150 | + fast: { pass: true, value: 1 }, |
| 151 | + }, |
| 152 | + }, |
| 153 | + }, |
| 154 | + null, |
| 155 | + 2, |
| 156 | + )}\n`; |
| 157 | + } |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | + test("a failing run does not replace the baseline and the next run still drops", async () => { |
| 160 | + const dir = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "dispatch-routing-")); |
| 161 | + const baselinePath = join(dir, "baseline.json"); |
| 162 | + const lastPath = join(dir, "last.json"); |
| 163 | + const before = stored(true); |
| 164 | + await writeFile(baselinePath, before); |
| 165 | + const timeouts: (number | string | undefined)[] = []; |
| 166 | + const run = async () => "reviewer\nI refuse."; |
| 167 | + try { |
| 168 | + const first = await evaluateRouting({ |
| 169 | + cases: [coderCase], |
| 170 | + run, |
| 171 | + lastPath, |
| 172 | + baselinePath, |
| 173 | + evaluateFn: (name, options) => { |
| 174 | + timeouts.push(options.timeout); |
| 175 | + return evaluate(name, options); |
| 176 | + }, |
| 177 | + }); |
| 178 | + expect(first).toBe(1); |
| 179 | + expect(await readFile(baselinePath, "utf8")).toBe(before); |
| 180 | + expect(await readFile(lastPath, "utf8")).not.toBe(before); |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | + const second = await evaluateRouting({ |
| 183 | + cases: [coderCase], |
| 184 | + run, |
| 185 | + lastPath, |
| 186 | + baselinePath, |
| 187 | + }); |
| 188 | + expect(second).toBe(1); |
| 189 | + expect(await readFile(baselinePath, "utf8")).toBe(before); |
| 190 | + expect(timeouts).toEqual([ROUTE_BUDGET_MS]); |
| 191 | + expect(ROUTE_BUDGET_MS).toBe(120_000); |
| 192 | + } finally { |
| 193 | + await rm(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); |
| 194 | + } |
| 195 | + }); |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | + test("a passing run updates the baseline", async () => { |
| 198 | + const dir = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "dispatch-routing-")); |
| 199 | + const baselinePath = join(dir, "baseline.json"); |
| 200 | + const lastPath = join(dir, "last.json"); |
| 201 | + await writeFile(baselinePath, stored(false)); |
| 202 | + try { |
| 203 | + const code = await evaluateRouting({ |
| 204 | + cases: [coderCase], |
| 205 | + run: async () => "coder\nAdd a regression test for token refresh.", |
| 206 | + lastPath, |
| 207 | + baselinePath, |
| 208 | + }); |
| 209 | + expect(code).toBe(0); |
| 210 | + const after = JSON.parse(await readFile(baselinePath, "utf8")) as { |
| 211 | + cases: { "fix-token-refresh": { routes: { pass: boolean } } }; |
| 212 | + }; |
| 213 | + expect(after.cases["fix-token-refresh"].routes.pass).toBe(true); |
| 214 | + expect(await readFile(lastPath, "utf8")).toBe( |
| 215 | + await readFile(baselinePath, "utf8"), |
| 216 | + ); |
| 217 | + } finally { |
| 218 | + await rm(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); |
| 219 | + } |
| 220 | + }); |
| 221 | +}); |
0 commit comments